Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Yokohama (Japan)
    Posts
    6,499
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default MCC gives switch-hit green light

    I thought it was stupid that they even thought about making switch-hits banned :rolleyes:


    The MCC has said the controversial switch-hit tactic used by England's Kevin Pietersen against New Zealand is legal within the laws of the game.
    Pietersen hit two sixes after changing his stance to left-handed but some commentators had asked whether it was in keeping with the spirit of the game.
    "The MCC believes that the switch-hit stroke is exciting for the game of cricket," said a statement.
    "It conforms to the Laws of Cricket and will not be legislated against."
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cric...nd/7456149.stm
    (゚Д゚≡゚Д゚)

    Roy: [singing] We don't need no education.
    Moss: Yes you do; you've just used a double negative

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    885
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    What's the point in banning something that only a handful of players can do and even then there's only like a 10% chance of them perfecting it. Silly people.

  3. #3

    Default

    Tbh ONLY Pietersen can do that shot, + there's a bigger chance that he'd mess the shot up and get out, so it's an advantage for the bowler to. So it's all fair in my eyes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    885
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StefanCampbell View Post
    Tbh ONLY Pietersen can do that shot, + there's a bigger chance that he'd mess the shot up and get out, so it's an advantage for the bowler to. So it's all fair in my eyes.
    Pietersen is like the 4th player to do that...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rhondda
    Posts
    6,463
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Yes, if batters can do that, they should be able to do but what if a bowler ran up to the crease and spin bowled it when he's a seamer? The bowler is bowling to a right handed person but when he changes to left handed what can he do?
    .

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    885
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Geraint View Post
    Yes, if batters can do that, they should be able to do but what if a bowler ran up to the crease and spin bowled it when he's a seamer? The bowler is bowling to a right handed person but when he changes to left handed what can he do?
    You have to declare what type of bowl you are doing [as for spin/seam] and whether you are going over or round the wicket whereas the batsman bats however he wants in any ball.

    Some people say that's a disadvantage but it's not, because to be fair both teams bat and bowl so it's the same rules for both teams...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rhondda
    Posts
    6,463
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hub View Post
    You have to declare what type of bowl you are doing [as for spin/seam] and whether you are going over or round the wicket whereas the batsman bats however he wants in any ball.

    Some people say that's a disadvantage but it's not, because to be fair both teams bat and bowl so it's the same rules for both teams...
    You don't have to declare if you bowl over the wicket or around. They were saying on Sky Sports that batsman wouldn't like it if a bowler change the way he bowled.
    .

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    885
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    You have to declare that due to the fact of self-erosion of the wicket and no, a batsman may not like it but it doesn't happen. Like I said, New Zealand are allowed to do the same if they wish, it's not just one rule for England or KP.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •