Seeing as I'm studying this in Politics I thought I'd get your views on it.
"Judges obtain many criticisms throughout their lifetime within the judiciary system. Most of these have come from the left wing of politics. The main argument that people tend to throw at the judicial system on the neutrality of judges is the fact that a large majority of judges within the system are male, white, upper-middle class and have attended Oxbridge/Cambridge University. Does this proven fact mean that judges cannot possibly maintain the neutrality that people want within the judicial system?"













They are bound to be upper-middle class and have attended univerties that are higher up in the scale, as this proves that they are some what competent because it's kinda obvious that, because they are judges, they're seen as 'higher up in the food chain', thus higher up in the class system. It's sort of how class works, born into or work yourself up, and with all that power they are bound to be seen as upper-class. A lower-class judge would not make much sense.


