To all Internet Explorer users

[HotelUser]

IE9 isn't that bad even though it doesn't support simple things like text-shadow but:



To all people who use IE my question is why. Why use something knowing it's worse than something else that's free?

Thread Closed by xxMATTGxx (General Manager): Closed due to being pointless and causing arguments.

[Recursion]

IE9 isn't that bad even though it doesn't support simple things like text-shadow but:



To all people who use IE my question is why. Why use something knowing it's worse than something else that's free?

IE6 is old, should be dumped.
IE7 is old, should be dumped.
IE8 is old, should be dumped (if you're on XP or below get Chrome or upgrade to W7)
IE9 is fine, provides site renders closest to the CSS3 and HTML5 published specifications, well supported in an enterprise environment
Firefox is buggy, crashy, renders well, should be dumped
Chrome is the best (unless in Enterprise)
Safari is ok if you're on a Mac, terrible in Windows, you should switch to Chrome
Never used Camino (?????)
Opera can suck ****

David should stop trolling the forum with useless information and false statistics. Love ya x

[HotelUser]

Actually IE9 is not fine, on the CSS3 standard or not text-shadow not supported even in IE9? Not to mention the other compatibility issues where websites render fine in every other browser including Firefox save for IE.

http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2011/0...-explorer.html

[Recursion]

Actually IE9 is not fine, on the CSS3 standard or not text-shadow not supported even in IE9? Not to mention the other compatibility issues where websites render fine in every other browser including Firefox save for IE.

http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2011/0...-explorer.html

The test-shadow property was never properly defined in CSS3 upon IE9's release, stop nitpicking and get on with life.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2368987,00.asp
http://generationsgap.com/latest-tec...on-of-malware/
http://www.html5trends.com/browsers/...in-html5-test/
http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/...al-HTML-5-Test

Baring in mind IE9 is over a year old now, it's done pretty well and I for one cannot wait to see what IE10 will bring to the table.

[Suspective]

Chrome is brilliant by far. I dumped IE years ago. I hate its chunky interface and the way it crashes constantly.

I have seen Chrome used in Enterprise more and more recently and it looks good, it works well and really enhances the network considerably.

[beth]

i like opera does this mean i am really cleva xoxo

[HotelUser]

The test-shadow property was never properly defined in CSS3 upon IE9's release, stop nitpicking and get on with life.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2368987,00.asp
http://generationsgap.com/latest-tec...on-of-malware/
http://www.html5trends.com/browsers/...in-html5-test/
http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/...al-HTML-5-Test

Baring in mind IE9 is over a year old now, it's done pretty well and I for one cannot wait to see what IE10 will bring to the table.

Good for IE9 then. I'll try to keep that in mind at the same time I think about how every other browser supports and supported it when IE9 came out and before.

i like opera does this mean i am really cleva xoxo

According to statistics yes!

[Recursion]

Chrome is brilliant by far. I dumped IE years ago. I hate its chunky interface and the way it crashes constantly.

I have seen Chrome used in Enterprise more and more recently and it looks good, it works well and really enhances the network considerably.

IE9 is not clunky.

[IMG]http://skitch.*****.co.uk/ie9clunkywut.png[/IMG]

[beth]

According to statistics yes!

fab news!! anyway: me and my best friend ben at uni were discussing something like this. he said everytime he went to a girls house and saw they used i.e as their main browser he knew he couldn't sleep with them cause they were ******ed. loving his work.

[HotelUser]

IE9 is not clunky.

-snip-

It's not good either.