Mk,
Our maths teacher (is not a good teacher at all) had supposedly taught us everything we needed to know in the course and it's now basically just revision/past papers etc. in class. So, we do a mock paper from 2011 (or 2010 idk) and in there is a question about finding out the area of a triangle (not equilateral) with only 1 side's measurement and 2 angles given; there's also a question later on about Circle Theorems.
We had not been taught how to work out those 2 questions at all - Basically, we weren't taught the Sine + Cosine rule nor Circle Theorems - because, and I quote my teacher on this, he "Didn't think they would come up in the exam."
Do you not find this to be completely stupid? Those questions were of the higher grades and each worth about 5 marks (a lot more marks than most of the other questions on the test) meaning we would have lost those marks/not gained them if it had been a real exam. I mean, fair enough in some subjects they can look at what hasn't appeared on papers for a few years and maybe hint at us to possibly revise it in case it does come up (e.g. on an R.E exam, abortion hasn't appeared in an exam since 2004 so there could be a slightly higher chance it appears in a 2012 exam but not a definite chance), but completely missing out topics surely isn't that fair upon students?
The worst part is, he couldn't even do the theorem himself for a while x.x Took him a good 20 minutes to actually remember what he had to do. He also did not explain the Cosine or Sine rule clearly enough, so literally no-one in the class got what he was saying? :S
Do you think it's really fair for him to have just missed that topic out? I'm not even sure if he's going to teach us it now, but I really would have preferred for him to teach us not a few weeks before my actual exam x.x





Reply With Quote









