Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. #1
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    29,945
    Tokens
    4,427
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default Farage promises to use social media to undercut TV Debates if he is excluded

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25041740

    Nigel Farage promises 'fun' if UKIP is denied election debate


    Nigel Farage says much of UKIP's surge in popularity is down to social media

    Quote Originally Posted by BBC News
    UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage has said he will produce a "fun" alternative broadcast if he is not allowed to take part in the leaders' TV debate at the next election.

    David Cameron says any debate will involve only people with a "prospect of becoming prime minister".

    But Mr Farage told The House magazine he would not be "excluded".

    He suggested the possibility of live-streaming on the internet while debates were running.

    The first televised debates were held before the last general election in 2010, involving the three main party candidates - Labour's Gordon Brown, Conservative Mr Cameron and Liberal Democrat Nick Clegg.
    Technology 'is power'

    It is not certain whether this will be repeated, but Mr Farage argues that, as his party is enjoying a sustained run of good ratings in the opinion polls, he should be included in any repeat.

    He told The House: "If UKIP has good cause to think that it should be in the TV debates and it's excluded, we will provide an alternative form of entertainment on the evening.

    "I'm working on some ideas. The internet is quite big these days... you could live-stream. There's one or two technical things we are working about and thinking about.

    "It would be quite fun, wouldn't it? People would have their TVs and their laptops next to it."

    Mr Farage added: "They might think they can exclude us but modern technology has such a power.

    "To be honest, if it wasn't for the internet we wouldn't be here. YouTube and Facebook and all of this has helped us to reach an audience we would not have reached."
    Dave, Nick and Ed can run but they can't hide.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    17,016
    Tokens
    34,327

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    David Cameron says any debate will involve only people with a "prospect of becoming prime minister".
    So why is Nick Clegg allowed to go on?

  3. #3
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    29,945
    Tokens
    4,427
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kardan View Post
    So why is Nick Clegg allowed to go on?
    Or David Cameron for that matter.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Aren't the Lib Dems a small party these days? if anything they should be excluded for not being a "real" party. It should just be Labour, the Conservatives and UKIP.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    Aren't the Lib Dems a small party these days? if anything they should be excluded for not being a "real" party. It should just be Labour, the Conservatives and UKIP.
    If you have Lib Dems I guess you should have UKIP, if you don't have Lib Dems I cannot see why you should include UKIP.


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Payasam View Post
    If you have Lib Dems I guess you should have UKIP, if you don't have Lib Dems I cannot see why you should include UKIP.
    Because they're ranking #4 and would with all valid reason be a wasted vote anyway since they won't stick by their promises anyway?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    Because they're ranking #4 and would with all valid reason be a wasted vote anyway since they won't stick by their promises anyway?
    UKIP would be no more of a vote realistically - yes they have gained massive popularity, but the next election is not their moment - and sadly, I think that is the only election for them to really do well in.


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Payasam View Post
    UKIP would be no more of a vote realistically - yes they have gained massive popularity, but the next election is not their moment - and sadly, I think that is the only election for them to really do well in.
    They do quite well in the European Elections and are projected to do better given the rise in Euroscepticism in recent years. Not sure what to think about local and general elections so can't really agree or disagree with your opinion. It will be interesting to see what happens, they may do well coming in 2nd or 3rd.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,481
    Tokens
    3,140

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    David Cameron says any debate will involve only people with a "prospect of becoming prime minister".
    I think Mr Cameron misunderstands the purpose of the general elections, we elect MPs not prime ministers.
    Chippiewill.


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    I think Mr Cameron misunderstands the purpose of the general elections, we elect MPs not prime ministers.
    But the parties all state who their head would be.. ie. the Prime Minister if they win. The debates were called "Prime Ministerial Debates" for a reason :L


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •