Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is online now Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,017
    Tokens
    809
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default Record number of foreign criminals cannot be deported

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...-deported.html

    Record number of foreign criminals cannot be deported

    In 2012/2013 602 appeals were allowed by the immigration courts, including 324 criminals allowed to stay in Britain because of their right to a family life


    Critics are likely say that the figures show that Theresa May, the Home Secretary, has failed to crack down on human rights abuses by foreign criminals.

    Quote Originally Posted by Telegraph
    A record number of foreign criminals won appeals against deportation on human rights grounds last year in a major blow to the Government’s tough stance on immigration, The Telegraph can disclose.

    Home Office data, disclosed for the first time, shows that 602 appeals were allowed by the immigration courts in 2012-13.

    They included 324 criminals who won the right to stay in Britain under the controversial “right to private and family life” set out in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

    Article 8 was the focus of a vote in the House of Commons last month that undermined the authority of David Cameron.

    Dozens of Conservative backbenchers supported an amendment, tabled by Dominic Raab, to the Immigration Bill that would have stripped the judges of their discretion to allow appeals on Article 8 grounds.

    The latest figures, which show the continuing and significant impact of the “family life” measures, will raise questions about ministers’ decision not to back Mr Raab’s amendment, which failed after Labour MPs were ordered to vote against it.

    The 602 total was slightly higher than the 600 recorded in 2010-11, and a significant leap from the year before the Coalition came to power, when the figure stood at 507.

    Critics of the Government’s record on immigration will seize on the figures as evidence that Theresa May, the Home Secretary, has failed to get tough on human rights abuses by foreign criminals.

    The total included 113 offenders who were convicted of serious or violent offences, including murder, manslaughter, rape, indecent assault and child sexual abuse. In 2012-13, three foreign criminals convicted of murder or manslaughter won appeals on human rights grounds – the highest figure on record.

    Last year’s figures also included 28 foreign offenders convicted of causing grievous or actual bodily harm, 30 robbers and 16 burglars.

    The 113 serious or violent offenders who won appeals was a similar figure to the previous two years, but represented an increase on 2008-09 when the number stood at just 13 and the following year, when it was 82.

    The overall number of appeals lodged by foreign criminals also reached a record high last year with 2,329 cases, up 36 per cent year on year.

    A Home Office spokesman said: “Those who come to the UK and break our laws should be deported.”

    The Telegraph last week disclosed two high-profile cases in which foreign offenders had won the right to stay in the UK. One involved Jason Efred Raje Francis, 26, who took part in the gang rape of a 14-year-old girl. Judges ruled that he cannot be deported because he has fathered two children in Britain, by different mothers.

    The other case involved Earl Daren Rodney, 25, who was convicted of looting a shop during the rioting that swept British cities in August 2011.
    And she's the Tories most favoured replacement for David Cameron as leader! Talk about not 'getting it'.

    What really is the point in this government when it acts and does everything that the Labour Party did, ie take orders from European Courts and protect criminality in general over the law abiding majority?

    Thoughts?


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I'm studying this at the moment The Human Rights Act is hilariously bad and should probably be repealed and replaced. The ECHR in general is out of date and needs a lot of work. It's based on 1950s/60s values and doesn't take into account modern criminal law and warfare (i.e. Terrorism).

    I feel sorry for her as she's getting a lot of blame for something she only has so much power over. She's so far acted really well at deporting high profiling criminals but the lesser known ones have no public backing to be deported because no one really knows of them. Unless the Government repeals or allows the court to deem the HRA/ECHR incompatible then there's not much that can be done.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •