HXSS SUGGESTION

[sex]

Can it be made this year that Staff/Event Hosts must report their points etc in public rather in a forum hidden away from normal users who aren't staff. It's clear over the years that staff cannot report points correctly, sometimes they don't even do it at all.
It's never noticed by management its usually noticed by a few member of staff, so unless your staff if points go missing you have no idea that they are going missing because its impossible to keep track of thousands of points over the two weeks.

Its not like some secret information is reported within the thread or whatever, If it so the winner can't be leak before the final leader-board update then that's stupid because a staff member could easily add them up! and everyone usually has a good idea who is gonna win anyways.

@xxMATTGxx; @Samanfa; @lawrawrrr;

[Kyle]

Teams need an even distribution too. Balances to prevent 1 team (green team this year it seems) from overfilling need to be put into place.

Don't see any reason to keep points private but also don't rlly see any reason to have them public. They'll be checked and rechecked by more than 1 person and if events from the timetable aren't in the points thread then the hosts can be chased up. All it will really cause is players harassing hosts "UPDATE MY POINT I JUST GOT NOW" etc.

Were there any noticeable problems last year

[Red]

Well I know deffo that points were v. regularly posted wrong and if I wasn't staff I wouldn't have been able to correct them. It would be good if maybe a summary of points could be posted at the end of the day or something.

[scottish]

Well I know deffo that points were v. regularly posted wrong and if I wasn't staff I wouldn't have been able to correct them. It would be good if maybe a summary of points could be posted at the end of the day or something.

isn't there a leaderboard for that

[Red]

isn't there a leaderboard for that

that don't where you have won your points from, just your final score. lmao I will keep a record of my own points!!

[Inseriousity.]

Mistakes happen but it's not that frequent and are easily fixable (and even "unofficial point-counters" - those people that religiously keep track of their own points - can make mistakes). They'd happen whether it was posted in public or not though so it doesn't matter either way imo. As for stopping teams from overfilling, teams close when they're full but the trick to avoid that is to get newbies on Habbo who win the odd game here and there to join [insert team that's closed] and eos just write it down so it requires vigilance from general management really to stick with the team lists available. The red team's lead last year shouldn't have been as high as it was and this was due to general mgmt taking the points at face value and just adding them rather than taking the attention it needs to avoid cheating as much as possible.

[Chippiewill]

Could always have a coded point reporting system so that hosts can easily immediately report them and users can instantly see that they've received the points.

[Empired]

Teams need an even distribution too. Balances to prevent 1 team (green team this year it seems) from overfilling need to be put into place.

think this really needs to be sorted to be honest. wouldn't be difficult to sort out would it?

It's kinda depressing when you're not on one of the two teams that's obviously going to win and all because there's only 3 active people on your team.

[Inseriousity.]

the staff distribution makes little difference tbh. it's all about who the active players are, both staff and non-staff, and there is no way management would be able to do teams based on activity. after my dismal first year as green team leader, the next few years I recruited all the non-staff addicts and won 2 (or maybe it was 3) times in a row. unless players are randomly assigned to teams, which would ruin the whole point of the event, you're not going to get around that.

[Chippiewill]

unless players are randomly assigned to teams, which would ruin the whole point of the event

It would?