Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    402
    Tokens
    2,225

    Latest Awards:

    Default Hey Anne Frank Death Believers: You've Got a Problem

    Anne and Margot Frank were in Auschwitz for roughly 2 months from September to October, right? Check this link: http://www.heretical.com/miscella/rudolf.html

    Over 6000 typhus deaths in that camp from that period, and this isn't even counting the typhus inmates who were allegedly sent to the gas chambers. If Anne Frank was fragile enough to get Scabies during her time there, why not typhus? Especially considering how easily it spread?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,817
    Tokens
    63,679
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    She probably did have typhus, that's what most people think she died of, what's your point
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    402
    Tokens
    2,225

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    She probably did have typhus, that's what most people think she died of, what's your point
    Because it can be argued that with these statistic, the 2 sisters could have contracted it in Auschwitz, a camp that statistically was known to hold typhus epidemics throughout it's entire operation. Going by this logic, they would never have survived in Bergen Belsen because the conditions there were worse with the tents and stealing in March. But the even more ridiculous part is that the timeframe for when the typhus started was never investigated. This makes it impossible for Anne to have survived this long because even before March of 1945, people were stealing her clothes, blankets, and food that was even supplied by Hanneli Goslar.

    - - - Updated - - -

    This also contradicts the typhus story of Bergen Belsen because going to Germany with typhus meant spreading it along with other people upon arrival, unlike the outbreak in 1945. The explanation? No typhus, at all.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    14,107
    Tokens
    4,179

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Omg enough of this conspiracy honestly this is getting tiring.
    /

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    402
    Tokens
    2,225

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Intersocial View Post
    Omg enough of this conspiracy honestly this is getting tiring.
    Last time I checked - it could just have been a dad trying to protect his traumatized kids.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    5,642
    Tokens
    12,065
    Habbo
    djclune

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallcoolguy700 View Post
    Anne and Margot Frank were in Auschwitz for roughly 2 months from September to October, right? Check this link: http://www.heretical.com/miscella/rudolf.html

    Over 6000 typhus deaths in that camp from that period, and this isn't even counting the typhus inmates who were allegedly sent to the gas chambers. If Anne Frank was fragile enough to get Scabies during her time there, why not typhus? Especially considering how easily it spread?
    The Auschwitz camps could hold over 100,000 people at one time. Statistically speaking she was more likely to not have been one of the typhus deaths in that camp.
    That's when Ron vanished, came back speaking Spanish
    Lavish habits, two rings, twenty carats

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    17,016
    Tokens
    34,327

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Do we even have anyone on this forum that identifies as a 'Anne Frank Death Believer'?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    7,144
    Tokens
    2,757

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kardan View Post
    Do we even have anyone on this forum that identifies as a 'Anne Frank Death Believer'?
    i'd like to see what happens if i answer this with a yes
    so yes

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,817
    Tokens
    63,679
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallcoolguy700 View Post
    Because it can be argued that with these statistic, the 2 sisters could have contracted it in Auschwitz
    Could have, yes, but not necessarily. The stats on the page you linked show 58,240 Jewish prisoners dead of typhus in the time she was there, out of 173,000. It's far more reasonable to assume that she was one of the 114,760 Jews present without typhus - it's nearly twice as likely, in fact

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallcoolguy700 View Post
    they would never have survived in Bergen Belsen
    They didn't, that's kinda the point

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallcoolguy700 View Post
    This also contradicts the typhus story of Bergen Belsen because going to Germany with typhus meant spreading it along with other people upon arrival, unlike the outbreak in 1945. The explanation? No typhus, at all.
    How is that contradictory? A whole bunch of Auschwitz prisoners (who you seem to think ALL had typhus) turn up in late 1944, and early 1945 there's a typhus epidemic there. It matches up perfectly.
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    402
    Tokens
    2,225

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Don View Post
    The Auschwitz camps could hold over 100,000 people at one time. Statistically speaking she was more likely to not have been one of the typhus deaths in that camp.
    This is actually one of the best arguments I've ever come across, except:
    -All the barracks ere lined up in rows and columns next to each other, so during the roll calls in early morning, it was still possible for a transfer to occur between barrack inmates.
    -This doesn't list the surviving typhus inmates, or typhus inmates sent to be gassed.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •