How do you feel about the death Penalty?

[Corey777]

If they had been brought up that it was morally right, this shouldnt meen a thing. If the law says that killing is illegal, then shouldnt that stop them?

Another saying comes into play. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you?

[Mentor]

If there broght up in a soity that belive tahst it is morally right, they would exspct it to. if they didin want oit to happen to them, they therefor woulnt blive in it being a right thing.
Theres always a motive behind actaions, however hard it may be to see, they dont do it becuse they thogh to themslevs "hey i got an idea, lets go commit and act of unspekable evil for no apprnt reason" or at least i hope for mankinds sake they dont

[Corey777]

If there broght up in a soity that belive tahst it is morally right, they would exspct it to. if they didin want oit to happen to them, they therefor woulnt blive in it being a right thing.
Theres always a motive behind actaions, however hard it may be to see, they dont do it becuse they thogh to themslevs "hey i got an idea, lets go commit and act of unspekable evil for no apprnt reason" or at least i hope for mankinds sake they dont

But are we not looking at this point at a view of killing not being accepted?

[Mentor]

This is starting to go on to teh subject of the good and evil debate?.
I see your point thogh.
From my moral point of veiw, killing someone who is know thret to you, is wrong. self defence killing i can understand.
Athogh id say touture is a far worse crime than killing, as tourture is far worse than death. wich is oen reson im hugly againt alot of the new teims laws as people are being held without trial. and torute as bad as what sadam did, is happening in the US, or at least quntniomo bay.

But from your own argumnt, if killing is wrong, then its also woirng to kill someone for killing. killing someone for killing is contridting itslef by saying killing is right? but then its wrong as well?

[Corey777]

Lol, confusing, but I understand. That would seem to be the answer. But aren;t there exceptions as you said? E.g. Self Defence? I meen, if you were the father of a little girl who was raped and killed and you found out the guy who did it was going to serve 10 years and get out, wouldnt you be steamed?

[Mentor]

But is sinking to his level realy the answer?
10 years in prson would be usless, 10 years of counsling and mental help would, duriung this tiem afetr coming to terms with there own action, the guilt felt would be far far worse than any punismnt that could be given to them. If the felt no remorse, it odes nt show eveil but more taht they are seriosly ill in the head, wich with teh compleity of the brain is easly posibe, to have the compelt inhanblty to feel remorse. mental help, and an instutiure for teh crimanly insain would be the only real option. If they felt no remores then they wouldnt feel guilt, they woudl not understand teh consepts of what they have done. Keeping them out of the mainstre woudl be the best action. killing them when they think ther inccent would be wrong.

[Corey777]

I think the mental institute would be the best idea. Set a minimum amount of time to be in there, then if they pass some tests and are better, they are released but closely watched. If they are not better by this time, keep them in for longer. Now it makes sense to me, but I still think it would cost a lot of money.

[Mentor]

It usealy is an exspencive option. But i still think it is a far better method. Of dealing with the problems rather than just getting rid of them.

[Butcher11]

But is sinking to his level realy the answer?
10 years in prson would be usless, 10 years of counsling and mental help would, duriung this tiem afetr coming to terms with there own action, the guilt felt would be far far worse than any punismnt that could be given to them. If the felt no remorse, it odes nt show eveil but more taht they are seriosly ill in the head, wich with teh compleity of the brain is easly posibe, to have the compelt inhanblty to feel remorse. mental help, and an instutiure for teh crimanly insain would be the only real option. If they felt no remores then they wouldnt feel guilt, they woudl not understand teh consepts of what they have done. Keeping them out of the mainstre woudl be the best action. killing them when they think ther inccent would be wrong.

Most of them are beyond help by now, you can't brainwash them. Listen, if my daughter was molested by some 40 year old pedo, if he got say 20 years or so(meaning 10 becuase of model behvior), I kill him, and I wouldn't feel guilty about it. People seriously ill in the head should be institutionalized before they kill, but after, too bad, they've killed, so now they'll die. If someone doesnt feel remorse, the more often they comit murders, the less remorse they feel.

[Mentor]

If you kill without remores, truly you are just as bad as any other murderer.
No one is beoned help. Pedofiles, have a chemical imablnce in the brain, wich cuases them to be attracted to the wrong age groups. They cant help that, its like balmeing someone for small ears? The death penlty fear in my belife cause pedos more than stop them. Without them more pedos would turn them slevs in before they did any actaion, and ask for help with teh problems, from a phyctric and medical basis. but isnted due to these lawas ifd they did, they probly think your going to kill them.
So carry on until they do do somthing horrible. Then get killed, and the cyecle then continues.