the "bulbs" are at a wrong angle
Their at about a Y dominant angle and the building is a frontal view
Just make it look like your looking at it straight on.
6/10 good effort
Results 11 to 20 of 24
Thread: Taj Mahal
-
20-04-2006, 01:41 PM #11
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Im on habbox Freaking moron
- Posts
- 120
- Tokens
- 6,800
nvrspk4 (Super Moderator): Do not have a signature that is way more 1337 then mine p10x?
1% of forum users have percantages in there signature if your part of the 99% put this in your sig.
-
You've mixed isometric and another angle and it just looks stupid.
-
not bad but it needs to be improved coz it aint the best 7/10
-
26-04-2006, 06:20 AM #14
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 4,347
- Tokens
- 3,432
- Habbo
- EvilBrandon
It needs a view point.
-
Not 3d enough, trees looked like a C & P job. But i like the way you have used pillars on it. 7/10
Xbox 360 Gamertag: WirelessMonkey
F1 Fan
Top Gear Fan
Scrubs Watcher
Mac Lover
PC Modder
-
the middle and base of the taj mahal look a bit flat 7/10
-
I have to agree with nearly everyone. Needs to be more 3-D. Besides that it is actually very good!
No more dreaming of the dead as the death itself was undone
No more crawling like a crow for a boy, for a body in the garden
No more dreaming like a girl so in love, so long
No more dreaming like a girl so in love, so long
Dreaming like a girl so in love with the wrong world.
-
Wow its really good. <Are those the taj mahal colours ;] ?
+ repi
-
They're at different angles, or is the taj mahal falling apart argh! ;o 6/10
-
Except for pillars and dome's it's too 2D.
Needs shading for 3D effect. 6/10
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts