Nope they do not, they're the only errors on a bog-standard page with them HTML 4 tags except I am missing the UTF-8 meta tag which is needed at strict but I can't be bothered putting it in.Originally Posted by Adzat
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...ol%2Findex.htm
http://www.freewebs.com/testingthiscodeoutlol/index.htm
Excuse the host it was the easiest. Check the source.
Results 11 to 19 of 19
Thread: [TUT] Your first HTML webpage
-
-
22-10-2006, 10:00 PM #12
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 11,266
- Tokens
- 8,688
- Habbo
- The-Quiet-One
Pleaserequestanamechange!
Nice tut anyway.
-
Not nice tut. Brilliant tut lol
Its so well laid out
-
Why do you think it's a good tutorial when it is incorrect..? Originally Posted by J-Rap
Not nice tut. Brilliant tut lol
Its so well laid out
-
rofl. If we're honest with ourselves. Who is going to read it? A few people. and they'll read through ur few hundred posts about fixing the errors (Which they'll appreciate)
What i meant was, if you just look at it without inspecting it. It looks very nice
-
I think the fact you start off by saying html, Hyper text Mark-up Langwage is a coding language, as opposed to a mark-up langwage, pretty much sums up my opinion of this tutoral...
-
Seconded. Originally Posted by 01101101entor
-
In xhtml 1.0 <font> has been depreciated and to be honest there is little point learning html when xhtml is the same but better
-
xhtml and css is over-riding html.
Shame really.REMOVED
Edited by jesus (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not have images in your signature which are over the size limit for your usergroup.
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts