I'm going to open up a proposition about rule A11.A11. Do not name anybody for hacking, scripting, trashing or any other bad things - Because we don't want innocent people being accused of illegal activities, we don't allow accusing others at all. This means it's also NOT allowed to accuse Habbo-X or Habbo Staff of abusing their powers or anything else. Also posting any images of people is NOT proof of them doing anything wrong as it could be an alteration. Even if you do have proof and know its 100% real, it is still not allowed to mention that the person has scammed/hacked etc as this starts arguements.
I think it's unfair for people not to know which people scam/hack whatever.
Even though it is someone's opinion that they Scam it might be true and therefore people should be able to say whether someone is trusted or not.
After all - if a majority of people say that they are trusted and the odd one say they're not trusted then the majority is obviously correct.
Also - if it's not allowed to say if someone's untrusted - why is it allowed to say if someone's trusted?
Opinions?





Reply With Quote






