Do you Think Sadam should of been Hung?

[Vodata1]

LONG LIVE THE KING

[GommeInc]

Completely wrong. it was not down to Bush and blair to decide upon sadams fate, for it was the judges and the panels decision to hang. Just because someone was a good leader, it cannot contemplate for what he done previously.

You do realise, he never personally murdered those people?

Have you not heard of the phrase, work with the present for the future? Not work with the past for the future?

Saddam was a good president, his only downfall was the fear of war between Iran and Iraq, the murders of a load of people in a village and non-existent weapons. As he never did kill those people personally, I don't think it is that bad. It was the followers of Saddam that slaughtered those people in discusting ways, not Saddam.

Also, if you want to play the past game. Saddam was an alcoholic who swore alot when he lived in Texas. Such a great President the US has. Also, Blair and Bush ordered the war to go ahead, and have killed more people than Saddam has ever done. When are they getting hung?

[Papershop]

Blair and bush did not do it personally though, if you think thats what matters.
the world was in danger, because we have one of the best ranked armies, it was are duty to invade.

[Chip.Monk]

Oh btw, did you people know that america funded sadam?

They did it to try and get rid of communists in iraq basically, what he did, wasn't possable without their help.

[Papershop]

well said

[GommeInc]

Blair and bush did not do it personally though, if you think thats what matters.
the world was in danger, because we have one of the best ranked armies, it was are duty to invade.

I was using your "amazing" theory. Obviously you are not acustom to sarcasm?

The US has one of the best armies?! They shoot first think later? The missled an EU/UN Convoy which was clearly showing the flag. They shoot allies on the same side without the blindest bit of sense? The "best" army would be an army that does it's job, not get aload of Iraqi Civilians in aload of homosexual positions or battering them about because they are black?

Oh btw, did you people know that america funded sadam?

They did it to try and get rid of communists in iraq basically, what he did, wasn't possable without their help.

Funny how the US thought they were funding Iraq's Nuclear Missile campaign which was I believe a reason to invade. It was possible what Saddam did with or without the money, we are talking about Saddam personally going to the public showing his love to the country. Not waving money in their faces?

[Papershop]

People are aloud there views, i have already stated mine, please dont try to convert me because it wont happen. The US and UK are doing the best they can to improve are safety, and i dont believe i have stated such a theory, that you keep mentioning in every post.

[MsTanya]

na i dont. i think that he was a good leader, jail would have been fair

[GommeInc]

Completely wrong. it was not down to Bush and blair to decide upon sadams fate, for it was the judges and the panels decision to hang. Just because someone was a good leader, it cannot contemplate for what he done previously.

So what did he do exactly? He never killed those people which is hinted in this post? It wasn't exactly a theory, more like an idea.

Bush and Blair never personally killed the Iraqi people. But your idea that Saddam did, because it seems to be the only reason you hate him. Bush and Blair should be hung, for allowing and continuing to allow the soldiers in Iraq because it seems the only reason for Saddam to be hung was because he killed the villagers all those years ago. The fact it was his represetantives and he never told them to use tree cutters and lamp posts seems to be out of the question. With this idea, we can extract the idea on to Bush and Blair with what they have done in the past, in Iraq.

US troops stripped Iraqi prisoners naked and put them in homosexual positions e.g. 69 position, doggy etc.
US troops shot civilians dead before ever trying to question them.
UK troops battered Iraqi prisoners because they were Iraqi. Same applies to the US.

Now, think of what people have said. "That Saddam killed these people." He never did, but we can say Bush and Blair killed/tourtured those people because we seem to allow people to say Saddam killed the people. Do they not deserve to be hung too?

Personally, I think what Saddam did, killing all those people was less psychologically embarassing as what the US and UK troops did to prisoners.

If you can't understand what I just said, I'll make a cleaner one in a few seonds.

[ebay]

he killed hundreds of people, so why shouldnt he have been killed himself