Naming Scammers Campaign

[Cwmbran]

Review - If a majority of the runescape forum believe it to be a good idea though, surely there could be a trial just in this section, and depending how it turns out, go on from there?

Well put.

[despute]

Yuhur, if it goes wrong and people abuse it take it away.

[:Jamie]

Ive come across people that fake people being scammers so I dont support. If this would be allowed then anyone can post crap about someone being a scammer and faking proof(which is easy to do) and I also doubt this would be allowed as it wouldn't just affect this forum it would affect the whole forum and therefore cause arguements everywhere, someone says his a scammer and he says he isnt and theres a pic which could be faked you cant really say whos telling the truth..and be unfair if an action was taken out on that person which could of been unfair..maybe think things through before starting something that wont happen?

People will only believe what they want to hear.

[T0M]

Ive come across people that fake people being scammers so I dont support. And who are you btw?

People could have changed? Why cant we give it a shot, if it doesnt work out it is easy enough to change it and return to rules of no naming scammers =)

[deagle]

Review - If a majority of the runescape forum believe it to be a good idea though, surely there could be a trial just in this section, and depending how it turns out, go on from there?

Also review, peoples opinions are changing atm, so just saying about the old threads made doesnt help. 'Progress only happens if people let it ' =)

People's rep could be damaged due to fake accusations.

But, since I'm not the decision maker, I say maybe try for a day. See what happens and how many fakers pop up.


While we're at this. Why not make a section for successful trades. The trades must have links to the trade section for proof that it wasnt just all set up with a friend. And ideally, the trades didnt take a minute to complete lol.

[:Jamie]

People could have changed? Why cant we give it a shot, if it doesnt work out it is easy enough to change it and return to rules of no naming scammers =)

Yes people can change from being trusted to scamming..that trusted person can easily say he didn't scam and people will believe him..because its what people want to hear. I still know it won't happen on this forum, management aren't that stupid to let this happen.

No sig for those who dont agree with this?

[T0M]

Yes people can change from being trusted to scamming..that trusted person can easily say he didn't scam and people will believe him..because its what people want to hear. I still know it won't happen on this forum, management aren't that stupid to let this happen.

I disagree that it is a question of if it is allowed that they made the Stupid decision. As i said, i think a trial would be a great idea, see what happens, then if it goes wrong youw ere right and nobody can ask it to be allowed again, but at least we have been given the chance

jamie ill make a sig for those who disagree to be fair to all, if you gimmie 10 mins? Although i doubt you'd use it so it would probs be a waste of my time?

[:Jamie]

I disagree that it is a question of if it is allowed that they made the Stupid decision. As i said, i think a trial would be a great idea, see what happens, then if it goes wrong youw ere right and nobody can ask it to be allowed again, but at least we have been given the chance

I don't have time to find the thread, this has been asked anyway and its been said it won't happen, also shows how easy a screenshot can be faked thats why I know they wont allow it.

This thread will die down soon anyway so don't bother just don't see why there isnt ones for those who disagree.

[Sly]

Here go jamie[img]http://www.****************/uploads/735957382d.gif[/img]

[T0M]

Here you go jamie
[img]http://www.****************/uploads/486f54fd77.png[/img]

For those who agree with jamie, there is a pic for sig