Naming Scammers Campaign

[SpellingMistake]

Tbh it is anoying not being able to name scammer but i supose its better than being falsely acused. Should just think oh no1s vouched for this guy so i won`t go first .

[ReviewDude]

Tbh it is anoying not being able to name scammer but i supose its better than being falsely acused. Should just think oh no1s vouched for this guy so i won`t go first .

Exactly, there are ways to build reputations - you don't need a system to destroy them

[---MAD---]

I think allowing members to name scammers would only cause arguements and doubts and would decrease the trust amongst members.

If you really want to warn someone about a scammer or w/e, you can PM him/her and warn her instead of announcing it publically on a post or whatever. This way the person offering to trade won't know and there won't be arguements etc .

Thanks
MAD

[Snubix]

300000000000000000000000000000000000000% support, however my signature is full down to the last character =l

[Shrlurp]

100% Agreed, However I Believe SUFFICIENT, Bad Spelling Should Be Needed.

[Seren]

Here you go jamie
[IMG]http://www.****************/uploads/486f54fd77.png[/IMG]

For those who agree with jamie, there is a pic for sig

might aswell make a sig for people who couldn't care less.

[Shrlurp]

Clearly You Want The Forum To Be Full Of Scammers...

[Seren]

Clearly You Want The Forum To Be Full Of Scammers...

Clearly I couldn't really care.

[Shrlurp]

Pfft... Jeez. Anyway Nvm The Noob. Go For It Cwmbran

[Seren]

Pfft... Jeez. Anyway Nvm The Noob. Go For It Cwmbran

You wouldn't be agreeing with him if you knew what it was like here when scammers were aloud to be named. It was World War II but worse.