POLL - SCRAP RARE VALUES PAGE OR NOT

[spanner-head]

[/b]

Yes, Everyone has said they have been good values over the past years, But recently the RV department and Values have gone down hill.

I still say scrap them, Or don't have fixed values..
Have ones like;

1.5-2.5 For the green dragon

[Thats just an example]

Agreed

[le harry]

Ya, restart habs rvr system pls.

[Seacat]

But then that's not values if you give a range. It goes from rare values to rare ranges.

I think what people need to realise is that just because a value is there doesn't mean that you have to trade that value down to the last rubber duck.

For example when you buy a car in real life it has a value. When you buy a house it has a value. It doesn't mean that you have to pay that value. The owner of the house/car can either ask for more than it's worth, or the person buying can try and get it at a cheaper price.

So actually I stand by my claim that one big problem shouldn't result in a department been abolished, just like one wrong news article shouldn't mean news is scrapped, or one wrong house price shouldn't mean an estate agents is closed down.

[le harry]

But then that's not values if you give a range. It goes from rare values to rare ranges.

I think what people need to realise is that just because a value is there doesn't mean that you have to trade that value down to the last rubber duck.

For example when you buy a car in real life it has a value. When you buy a house it has a value. It doesn't mean that you have to pay that value. The owner of the house/car can either ask for more than it's worth, or the person buying can try and get it at a cheaper price.

So actually I stand by my claim that one big problem shouldn't result in a department been abolished, just like one wrong news article shouldn't mean news is scrapped, or one wrong house price shouldn't mean an estate agents is closed down.

This is buying pixelated Sofa's, not buying a car irl or a house irl

[Seacat]

It's the same principle..

I always try to relate things to real life to put them in context otherwise people start thinking/expecting things that are impossible.

[spanner-head]

But then that's not values if you give a range. It goes from rare values to rare ranges.

I think what people need to realise is that just because a value is there doesn't mean that you have to trade that value down to the last rubber duck.

For example when you buy a car in real life it has a value. When you buy a house it has a value. It doesn't mean that you have to pay that value. The owner of the house/car can either ask for more than it's worth, or the person buying can try and get it at a cheaper price.

So actually I stand by my claim that one big problem shouldn't result in a department been abolished, just like one wrong news article shouldn't mean news is scrapped, or one wrong house price shouldn't mean an estate agents is closed down.

Yeh but the thing is people do trade down to the last rubber duck. And its the most anoying thing ever. People dont understand that its a guild, but when you put prices at 1.2 , 1.7, then to me if i didn't read the guild blurb at the top, that seems to be an exact value.

[le harry]

The 1.7's are annoying. You give them a hc and a tubmaster or whatever, then you say i add 2 pods and a bath. they are like omgz no thats only 1.69854854. Comon, just stick at. 1HC - 2HC.

[spanner-head]

If you look at house prices now nearly all of them have I.T.R.O (In the region of) prices. :p

[spanner-head]

The 1.7's are annoying. You give them a hc and a tubmaster or whatever, then you say i add 2 pods and a bath. they are like omgz no thats only 1.69854854. Comon, just stick at. 1HC - 2HC.

***** I agree. I jsut ive them a duck profit to shut them up. Dont you think habbos should decide what they trade at. Thats why the range guild is better. It also doesn't cause as much confusion as its not an exact price and people dont live by it.

Edited by micky.blue.eyes (Super Moderator): Please don't double post.

[Seacat]

Well it is a value, that's why they're called rare values.

What I'm saying is that, yes the values are there, but no you don't have to follow them exactly. I've given examples in my other post. It clearly states on the Rare Values page that "our rare values are a guide".