Harry Potter RUBBISH film.

[Eamonn]

Are you saying the film was rubbish as a stand-alone film, or compared to the other films, or compared to the book?

The film in a whole was rubbish imo

& Andydude, what are you on about? OOTP is one of the most highly ranked books out of the series ''/

[ColyTom]

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is the worse Harry Potter film I have ever seen, it is rushed and here is a list of the rubbish things :

Show Hide

• Quidditch cut out completely
• All of the rooms at the ministry are missed out for example the room with the brains and the time room
• St.Mungo's is cut out completely
• No Gildery Lockhart
• Mrs Figg an absolutely appalling actress
• No howler for Petunia Dursley
• Grimauld Place only appears twice and for a short time
• No Boggart and Mrs Weasley
• Sirius' Mum's portrait only appears once and behind a curtain
• Neville doesn't get tortured by Bellatrix Lestrange
• No interview in the Quibbler with Rita Skeeter and Harry
• Only a tiny mention of OWLs and exams
• No Freinz teaching Divination
• No nearly headless Nick
• No two way mirrors
• A radio in hogwarts with chart music? Electronics don't work at hogwarts and why chart music? Why not the Weird Sisters or other wizarding bands
• No prefects
• Cho's friend doesn't appear or snitch on the DA instead Cho confesses to Umbridge under a truth potion

So I would rate the film a 3/10 mainly because it had good special effects and normally I would rate the films highly but this one was absolutely dreadful which is surprising considering I found the 5th book the best and bad news David Yates is directing the 6th film so I am expecting the same.

The quidditch matches were boring anyway.

[Invent]

The film overall wasn't bad, the only problem was there wasn't much action into very late into the film so it just felt like when the action came the movie was over in a flash.

[Earthquake]

I haven't actully seen the film, But judging by the adverts it kinda does seem an okay film.

[today]

Its too slow, from the book its full of action yet the film misses half of it out, i dont see why they extend the length of the film, some films have "breaks" in them when there 'x' hours long, i'll rather have a 3-4 hour harry potter film which has much more in then 2 and a half with boring stuff.

[Mitch4?]

I read 1-4, and about 100 pages of 5. So most of 5 was completly unknown to me, and i loved it!
I prefered it more than the others because i didn't know if they missed anything out.

But tbh, movies that last about 2-3 hours will have about 100 page scripts, so theres really no wonder why they had to miss out LOTS!
I thought it was pretty amazing :] xo! loved the old bag, she annoyed me with the slap on harry !! but i did laugh

[Ed.]

The film was really bad!! Also - u dont really learn much in the film.. it kinda goes nowhere!!

[Stephen]

I think it was a great film. As people said they cut bits out, but they can't put every bit of the book into it.

I was disappointed with:

Missing some good parts from the book out.
Changing it around (about Cho telling on the DA).
But the biggest disappointment was.. It wasn't on as long as most of the others.. They could of made it a 3hour film and added some important parts which they missed out.

[dorothy]

the films are always really crap.