Lol yeah, it could go either way depending on how much the courts think this affects society. Considering it's a company claiming for furniture they still own, they won't get it, but considering the amount of times scamming goes on and how many "innocent habbos" are deprived of their furniture, the courts could let Sulake win to set an example. It's mean on the 17-year-old though, so Sulake will probably lose.







Reply With Quote




