http://www.ss-host.com
OR
http://ss-host.com/v1.9.0/downloads.html
Which do you prefer? Also, shall I carry on using/use the choice you have chosen in the next version?

http://www.ss-host.com
OR
http://ss-host.com/v1.9.0/downloads.html
Which do you prefer? Also, shall I carry on using/use the choice you have chosen in the next version?
Hi
i like both
I dont like either of them if im honest, but 2nd one is the better.
But it loads dead fast :p
Posts merged by jesuswhere!
TBH neither![]()
REMOVED
Edited by jesus (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not have images in your signature which are too large for your usergroup. Also do not have text in your signature which is over size 4.
REMOVED
Edited by jesus (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not have images in your signature which are too large for your usergroup. Also do not have text in your signature which is over size 4.
1st one is a hosting layout.
2nd one isn't.
Both are very, very ugly.
First ones good, but i like 2nd one to
None. Both are horrid and are not really suitable for a hosting company. If you want to look professional and bring in the customers, you need templates like speedhosting.co.uk
Tbh the name is a little EEK!
I think that the second one, with more work could be better. Neither really suit though. Good luck with the hosting situation.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!