Michael Jackson......

[ttranquility.]

omgg he should be guilty hes so ARG i hate him so much and i hate the verdict for saying that he is NOT GUILTY!

[Angster]

omgg he should be guilty hes so ARG i hate him so much and i hate the verdict for saying that he is NOT GUILTY!

So because you hate him, he's guilty? You don't even know the guy enough to hate him. You just know from what you've heard on TV. This isn't a game. They aren't going to put someone who they feel is innocent in jail. That's not how it works. And before you decide to reply to this and make an even bigger fool of yourself, I suggest you read this: http://www.habboxforum.com/showpost....46&postcount=9

And for the rest of the people with similar views: Because someone isn't normal, or because someone doesn't look normal, or act normal, that doesn't make them guilty of something as serious as child molestation. If that's how the system works, then our world would be even more messed up than it already is. Your personal opinion of someone doesn't reflect on whether they are guilty or innocent. As I said before, it all comes down to proof - which there was none at all.

[Grabbed]

yeah i did find it a bit suspicious that he was aquitted on even the lesser counts surely they would have found him guilty on one thing

[Steph]

I think he's guilty...and thats just me saying that coz I hate him lol. he's scary. and i know the saying don't judge a book by its cover blah blah blah, but he looks like he's a perv and he talks scary..

[Mentor]

So because you hate him, he's guilty? You don't even know the guy enough to hate him. You just know from what you've heard on TV. This isn't a game. They aren't going to put someone who they feel is innocent in jail. That's not how it works. And before you decide to reply to this and make an even bigger fool of yourself, I suggest you read this: http://www.habboxforum.com/showpost....46&postcount=9

And for the rest of the people with similar views: Because someone isn't normal, or because someone doesn't look normal, or act normal, that doesn't make them guilty of something as serious as child molestation. If that's how the system works, then our world would be even more messed up than it already is. Your personal opinion of someone doesn't reflect on whether they are guilty or innocent. As I said before, it all comes down to proof - which there was none at all.

Yea but when that not acting normal includes inviting childern in to his bed to sleep with them, i tend to get the opion there guilty

[Kyle.tk]

Ive never really known. There have been times when ive thought 'he's guilty' and others when ive thought he's not. I dont think he has molestered a child, but i think he has, played with himself with minors. As the child (cant remember name) described michaels thingy miboby (gotta be careful on the forum) and got alot of details right. That he is guilty of. Also, in his neverland ranch (recently been sold due to michaels debts) when police raided it, they found serveral teen ****ography magazines. That he is guilty of. I dont believe he molestered a child, but i believe the above what i said.
You shouldnt judge him because he looks scary or because you hate him for some crazy reason. He has been one of the best entertainers of all time, can any of you doubt that. He has created some of the best songs ever such as Billy Jean, Thriller and Smooth Criminal. He may have a strong relationship with younger boys, but that does not make him a paedophille.

[Angster]

Yea but when that not acting normal includes inviting childern in to his bed to sleep with them, i tend to get the opion there guilty

Yeah, but do you actually know that went on? That's the thing: no one knows but Michael and the children. Obviously, they thought Michael had a stronger case. And basically, the trial is pointless without proof. I'm not saying these things did not take place, there's just no proof that they actually did.

No, I'm not some Michael Jackson lover. And no, he may not be innocent. But without proof, they can't do anything to the guy.

I guess it is sort of weird that he was found innocent on all counts... Money can get you somewhere these days, even out of jail. But if you actually knew Michael's history, you may feel more sympathy for the guy. If you knew even a little bit about Michael, you'd know that his dad was a truly terrible person, to Michael and his family. I'm not saying "Put all the blame on the out-of-control father!", but it's obviously one of the main reasons Michael has a few things loose up there.

[Mentor]

Yeah, but do you actually know that went on? That's the thing: no one knows but Michael and the children. Obviously, they thought Michael had a stronger case. And basically, the trial is pointless without proof. I'm not saying these things did not take place, there's just no proof that they actually did.

well actaly, there a documnety where he said he did, to the camra, wich was braodcast on tv, not so long ago.

No, I'm not some Michael Jackson lover. And no, he may not be innocent. But without proof, they can't do anything to the guy.

I guess it is sort of weird that he was found innocent on all counts... Money can get you somewhere these days, even out of jail. But if you actually knew Michael's history, you may feel more sympathy for the guy. If you knew even a little bit about Michael, you'd know that his dad was a truly terrible person, to Michael and his family. I'm not saying "Put all the blame on the out-of-control father!", but it's obviously one of the main reasons Michael has a few things loose up there.

If hes deemed insain, so be it, keep him in a home, but hes legal sain, and therefor fully responcible for his actaions "/

[Pulchritudinous]

On sky they do a reconstruction of the court case, and the home alone boy said he'd slept in a bed with Michael on many occasions, although he thought Michael was innocent, so there you go I got my proof.... Michael Jackson did invite boys to sleep in the same bed as him.

Michael Jackson has kids, and wouldn't you find it very strange if your dad slept with other kids, because I know I would!

I heard him say on an interview that kids are his faviroute people, which is understandable, children are innocent cute etc, and easy to love, Michael Jackson says he never had a childhood and is making up for it, okie dokie, fine with that, I just don't think sleeping in the same bed as kids is giving him 'the childhood he never had'.

[Angster]

well actaly, there a documnety where he said he did, to the camra, wich was braodcast on tv, not so long ago.

If hes deemed insain, so be it, keep him in a home, but hes legal sain, and therefor fully responcible for his actaions "/

Right, so on TV, he's going to tell the whole nation he's guilty, then the final verdict says he's innocent? That doesn't make sense. And just because he may be perverted, that doesn't make him "insane". Note, I didn't say he was insane, he just has a lot of things messed up with his life. Yes, he is responsible for his actions, but again, what actions took place? He's obviously innocent for a reason. Drop it.

On sky they do a reconstruction of the court case, and the home alone boy said he'd slept in a bed with Michael on many occasions, although he thought Michael was innocent, so there you go I got my proof.... Michael Jackson did invite boys to sleep in the same bed as him.

Michael Jackson has kids, and wouldn't you find it very strange if your dad slept with other kids, because I know I would!

I heard him say on an interview that kids are his faviroute people, which is understandable, children are innocent cute etc, and easy to love, Michael Jackson says he never had a childhood and is making up for it, okie dokie, fine with that, I just don't think sleeping in the same bed as kids is giving him 'the childhood he never had'.

Just because kids were in his bed, that doesn't mean anything actually took place. Sure, it sounds a bit sketchy, but if you have been totally ignoring my posts... THERE WAS NO GOD DAMN PROOF THAT ANYTHING ILLEGAL TOOK PLACE. Without proof, they can't send him to jail. I don't see what's so hard to understand about that. Yes, he's a freak, he's weird looking, he's messed up in the head. That doesn't stand as any freaking proof, and that doesn't mean he's guilty.