Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 42
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,308
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Theresno evidence saying hes NOT GUILTY. I mean the victims, the raid, the nude pictures and stuff they found.
    -
    I reackon somethings going on. Conspiricy. Lol the jury..
    I reackon he paid em'. They are making a book, of why the found him not guilty. Pfft. I sorta like him musicwise .. but he shouldnt get away with no warnings.
    Its about the quality of the post, not quanity! ©

    "One Who Gossips to you, Gossips OF you."©[My quotes, Mine! *Smack*]


    E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G "Cuz your my everything ... "

    Keep Giving Rep Points To People Who Deserve It Its Not A Popularity Contest © ?-Doc-?

    "I Am .. Your Father"

    Concentric - Super Mod
    Please do not have an excessively large signature, or one which uses more than one picture/smiley.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,762
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Angster
    Right, so on TV, he's going to tell the whole nation he's guilty, then the final verdict says he's innocent? That doesn't make sense. And just because he may be perverted, that doesn't make him "insane". Note, I didn't say he was insane, he just has a lot of things messed up with his life. Yes, he is responsible for his actions, but again, what actions took place? He's obviously innocent for a reason. Drop it.


    Just because kids were in his bed, that doesn't mean anything actually took place. Sure, it sounds a bit sketchy, but if you have been totally ignoring my posts... THERE WAS NO GOD DAMN PROOF THAT ANYTHING ILLEGAL TOOK PLACE. Without proof, they can't send him to jail. I don't see what's so hard to understand about that. Yes, he's a freak, he's weird looking, he's messed up in the head. That doesn't stand as any freaking proof, and that doesn't mean he's guilty.
    God, I said inviting kids to sleep with him was strange, I never said it was illegal nor did I say he was guilty, I don't even know why your accusing me of that.
    Think about it, if some guy down your road slept with kids, it would be the same, I don't care if he's Michael Jackson, grown men shouldn't sleep in the same bed as a kid.

    Plus I never said 'my proof is...he looks weird!' did I, instead of telling me I'm ignoring your posts, read mine properly!





  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    CB9
    Posts
    4,996
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    good on him i dont think he did it

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    England, Kent
    Posts
    1,040
    Tokens
    273

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    *cough* guilty *cough cough*
    5th October - All Time Low w/ The Audition & TFNB @ Camden Underworld
    10th October - Enter Shikari w/ TDWP @ London Roundhouse
    11th November - A Skylit Drive @ London Barfly
    19th November - Dragonforce @ Leas Cliff Hall
    22nd November - The Enemy @ Leas Cliff Hall
    16th December - Set Your Goals w/ Fireworks & Broadway Calls @ 02 Academy Islington

    http://www.last.fm/user/connorlolol

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,283
    Tokens
    2,031

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Angster
    Right, so on TV, he's going to tell the whole nation he's guilty, then the final verdict says he's innocent? That doesn't make sense. And just because he may be perverted, that doesn't make him "insane". Note, I didn't say he was insane, he just has a lot of things messed up with his life. Yes, he is responsible for his actions, but again, what actions took place? He's obviously innocent for a reason. Drop it.
    Not going to, he did, its the wyole reason the case started up, after teh documnetry where he said he slept in the same bed as children, wjhile sitteing there holding hands with another 10 or 211 year old boy.

    This was seen by millions of people? what actions took place, well sleeping with childern, mickle jackosn even said he did in a so called "non sexual way" *cough*

    PLus gieving alchol to miners, to wich an entire cabin crew, everone on the plane at the time, testifed tp, and mickle jackson has also admited to doing before clameing there was nothing wrong with it.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Are you sure you want to know?
    Posts
    6,998
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    He's just really weird. He acts like a kid becuse he never had his childhood but still..sleeping with kids in same bed is sick for me but if he didn't touched them then he didn't broke any law. I don't know about whole alcohol thingy.
    I freaking adore Ashley ^_^

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Uranus
    Posts
    134
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ?-Doc-?
    Theresno evidence saying hes NOT GUILTY. I mean the victims, the raid, the nude pictures and stuff they found.
    -
    I reackon somethings going on. Conspiricy. Lol the jury..
    I reackon he paid em'. They are making a book, of why the found him not guilty. Pfft. I sorta like him musicwise .. but he shouldnt get away with no warnings.
    Obviously the court thinks he's not guilty. And as I have said countless times - I'm not saying these things didn't take place, but the court obviously didn't call him on it. How does it affect you anyways? Planning any visits to the Neverland ranch soon? No? That's what I thought. And I doubt any kids will be visiting it anytime soon after the case, either.

    God, I said inviting kids to sleep with him was strange, I never said it was illegal nor did I say he was guilty, I don't even know why your accusing me of that.
    Think about it, if some guy down your road slept with kids, it would be the same, I don't care if he's Michael Jackson, grown men shouldn't sleep in the same bed as a kid.

    Plus I never said 'my proof is...he looks weird!' did I, instead of telling me I'm ignoring your posts, read mine properly!
    Well you talked about kids going into his bed, then you said "There's my proof", implying "There's the proof that makes him guilty". Excuse me for reading between the lines. And that last line wasn't directed at you anyways. And I can read, thanks. Maybe you're the one who should look more deeply into posts, dear.

    Not going to, he did, its the wyole reason the case started up, after teh documnetry where he said he slept in the same bed as children, wjhile sitteing there holding hands with another 10 or 211 year old boy.

    This was seen by millions of people? what actions took place, well sleeping with childern, mickle jackosn even said he did in a so called "non sexual way" *cough*

    PLus gieving alchol to miners, to wich an entire cabin crew, everone on the plane at the time, testifed tp, and mickle jackson has also admited to doing before clameing there was nothing wrong with it.
    I'm aware that he did, I was using reference to explain why your post was just utterly moronic and made no sense at all. And JESUS CHRIST! Holding hands?! I can't believe he did that! I smell a death penalty! And a "211-year-old boy", didn't know those existed. And remember, this is coming from TV. Not personal experience, which really doesn't stand as anything. TV can be edited, things can be said that aren't true, lies can be made to make Michael look like the bad guy. Does it mean it's true? No. Does it mean he's guilty? No.
    Last edited by Angster; 16-06-2005 at 06:14 PM.
    // dobi fan

    fullbleed | dobi | htde 2.0

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,283
    Tokens
    2,031

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Angster

    I'm aware that he did, I was using reference to explain why your post was just utterly moronic and made no sense at all. And JESUS CHRIST! Holding hands?! I can't believe he did that! I smell a death penalty! And a "211-year-old boy", didn't know those existed. And remember, this is coming from TV. Not personal experience, which really doesn't stand as anything. TV can be edited, things can be said that aren't true, lies can be made to make Michael look like the bad guy. Does it mean it's true? No. Does it mean he's guilty? No.
    Well maybe its normal for you to see a 40 year old man hugging and holding hands with a 12 year old, but the rest of us kind of think it starnge, Plus notice Ive said he slept in the same bed a childeren, not that he molested them, eventhogh i think he probably did.
    What ive said is true, you can check for yourself if you want, the footage wasnt edited, and not even mickle jackson clames its not real, so it looks liek your the only one who thinks is made up.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Uranus
    Posts
    134
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mentor
    Well maybe its normal for you to see a 40 year old man hugging and holding hands with a 12 year old, but the rest of us kind of think it starnge, Plus notice Ive said he slept in the same bed a childeren, not that he molested them, eventhogh i think he probably did.
    What ive said is true, you can check for yourself if you want, the footage wasnt edited, and not even mickle jackson clames its not real, so it looks liek your the only one who thinks is made up.
    40-year-old parents, relatives, and close friends hug and hold hands with 12-year-old kids. How is it strange? How do you know Michael didn't know these kids?

    I didn't say the footage was edited, either. Maybe someone testifying said something that wasn't true.

    It's final - Michael is innocent, it's not going to change unless some kids/parents can come up with some damn good proof. Until then, I'll continue to believe what I think is true.
    // dobi fan

    fullbleed | dobi | htde 2.0

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,762
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Angster
    Well you talked about kids going into his bed, then you said "There's my proof", implying "There's the proof that makes him guilty". Excuse me for reading between the lines. And that last line wasn't directed at you anyways. And I can read, thanks. Maybe you're the one who should look more deeply into posts, dear.

    What?! I never 'implied that he was guilty.

    so there you go I got my proof.... Michael Jackson did invite boys to sleep in the same bed as him.
    I followed on to say...he did invite boys to sleep in the same bed as him.
    I just don't understand how that show's I think he's guilty, the court said he's innocent, so he must be.
    I was simply saying, it is strange for a grown man to sleep in the same bed as a young boy.

    P.S. I'm not 5 years old, you don't need to call me dear.
    Last edited by Pulchritudinous; 16-06-2005 at 09:16 PM.





Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •