Isnt he still getting charged for serving some child alcohol?

Isnt he still getting charged for serving some child alcohol?
he wasd found inaceent of that, wich is deffitaly true, wich is why i dont belive any of the verdicts were correct.Originally Posted by Darkangel909
Isnt he still getting charged for serving some child alcohol?
Bribary seems likly, anda also backed up by the fact the "legal" fee's are apparntly going to cost so much, he may have toi sned neverland
Hmm, tbh i just reckon hes a bit twisted in the head. He seems to think hes still a child. I mean how many of u have shared a bed with a mate, top and tailing at sleepovers or something. And theres nothing wrong with that but imagine if that friend was a 40 year old man. Then that would be twisted! You proberly kiss your friends on the cheek, or give them a hug when there down. You may of given your mates alcohol. Maybe Jacko just doesnt understand where the line is between childhood and adulthood. I mean, hes been on stage since he was like 5, was abused by his fathers. He obviously has issues but maybe hes just naive (cant spell mean ni-eve) instead of sinister.
bef
eloves
chin
Yeah, I think he's had a loss of childhood also. It would explain why he does act like that a bit more.. Ah I don't know, if he really is innocent then fair doo's but otherwise I just think he's sort of lost it due to a mucked up childhood.
if you hadnt heard this by now, you're in a very deep dark hole somewhere...
This Account Is Rarely Used
Yer, i posted this in other jacko thread but il put it here to.
Apparently
Any adult sharing a bed with a minor isnt illegal (unless they touch them sxually)
andddd
You can show x rated films and pictures to children...
sick init! thats all LEGAL!
bef
eloves
chin
i soo wanted him to go to jail, he got on my nerves
![]()
Thank You Redstratocas For The Sig
im no big Micheal Jackson fan to be honest i couldnt give a **** if he did go to prison but i think your all being very narrow minded. He isnt guilty it has been proven in a court of law, simple. I never thought he was guilty, hes just a bit messed up :eusa_thin lol he seems to think of himself as this peter pan figure there is no sexual angle to the way he treats children he feels an obligation to care for them. However in modern society his ways are not accepted due to the massive media fueled hunt for pedos.
:eusa_thin
Omg for god sake leave the man alone and 1 more thing he couldnt have bribed any1 coz he didnt have any money anyway he was bankrupt before he went to court
are you insane? he admitted to letting children sleep in bed with him, that right there means there is something wrong with him, wether or not it is pedophelia he definetly has SOMETHING wrong with him. I don't believe he should go to jail, because I don't think he really molested those kids. But I do think he should get therapy because inside he still is a child. If he was a pedophile then he could have paid kids to "play" with them instead of molesting innocent kids.Originally Posted by DJ-COLLINS!
theres nothink rong with him
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!