In regards to this new banning thing.

[Pat McGroin]

I wasn't anti-Habbox, I never was. I just had an opinion what you're not allowed anymore.

[Hitman]

J1MI and elkaa do pick their staff.

And no its not the same thing. Being anti-habbox and expecting to keep your job is ridiculous.

I agree with that, if you're working anywhere and are dragging it down wouldn't you expect to be fired/cautioned? Same applies for Habbox. It's like working in McDonalds and shouting "GO TO BURGER KING IT'S BETTER!" to every customer that enters, you wouldn't keep the job long.

[WarezKid]

J1MI and elkaa do pick their staff.

And no its not the same thing. Being anti-habbox and expecting to keep your job is ridiculous.

I agree with that, if you're working anywhere and are dragging it down wouldn't you expect to be fired/cautioned? Same applies for Habbox. It's like working in McDonalds and shouting "GO TO BURGER KING IT'S BETTER!" to every customer that enters, you wouldn't keep the job long.

I agree -.-

[---MAD---]

I agree with that, if you're working anywhere and are dragging it down wouldn't you expect to be fired/cautioned? Same applies for Habbox. It's like working in McDonalds and shouting "GO TO BURGER KING IT'S BETTER!" to every customer that enters, you wouldn't keep the job long.

Yeah. Thats a good example too .

[Immenseman]

lolsuckup

Right, because a member of staff agrees with this new method then they're a suck up? No, of course not. I'm sure there are plenty of users who agree with this so you're calling them all suck ups? :rolleyes:

[GommeInc]

As sierk said in his post, we will be banning those people faster than before.



I am really not sure why you are finding it hard to understand GommeInc.

I don't see why Management find it hard to understand that the whole Habbox empire has walls tumbling and there is no one around because they're too busy in the garden. Work that one out. The rule existed for years, I don't see what irrational fool came up with 'they'll be banned faster' because 1. That just proves to many people that Habbox has gotten just that little bit more corrupt, banning people for no real reason and 2. It's just another pointless rule which has already existed and won't make the blindest bit of difference. I don't see why you or anyone else doesn't notice that...

Also, about butting into someones job e.g. the Forum Managers job, here are a few things he or Elkaa should of posted and made the final though. Your job, ----MAD---- is with the Site. Unless you could explain while any other GM (Site Manager) before you worked more with the site, while you seem to take over and do this One Man Show part.

Mobile Devices sub-forum
---MAD---
--ss-- now a Forum Super Moderator.
---MAD---
H0BJ0B now Assistant Radio Manager.
---MAD---
Yum999 now assistant news manager.
---MAD---
mat64 now a Forum Super Moderator.
---MAD---
Garion now a forum moderator.
---MAD---

And:

J1MI takes over as Forum Manager.
---MAD---

Which seems to be the biggest Habbox Lie of 2007. MAD, you are doing someone elses job, so either you change your title to 'Site Manager' or you fire J1MI, or demote him to a lower title, because he is far from a Forum Manager. There are also announcements which should of been made by a News Manager, Radio Manager.

So why is Habbox such a mess in terms of staff allocation? J1MI isn't a Forum Manager, you are, but you aren't you're the Site Manager (considering that is the other name for General Manager, when they really should of just given it the name Site Manager). There are also aload of AGMs which seems to be a big title for 'Administrator' which is a terrible idea. The AGMs already have titles (e.g. News Manager) and this is why those managers departments are failing miserably, they have another big title which getsd them too involved with something else. Take a look at companies, you don't see the CEO running around doing everything, which you seem to be, and this will lead to the whole company crashing. You don't see Managers of other departments also running a different part of the company, increasing work load?

Why don't you understand this?

Also, there is a difference between being Anti-Habbox e.g. "Habbox suxors" and constructive criticism "this part of Habbox is failing miserably or the management need to rethink this." Most staff fired for being 'Anti-Habbox' are doing the latter. And you could save yourself the time and effort banning people if you listened and went back intime and used the same methods and management skills as Habbox 2004-2005. Back then habbox was more organised. This Habbox is an organised chaos if anything...

[J1MI]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Death Note
lolsuckup


Right, because a member of staff agrees with this new method then they're a suck up? No, of course not. I'm sure there are plenty of users who agree with this so you're calling them all suck ups? :rolleyes:

That made me laugh, it's exactly what i've been thinking whilst reading through all these threads. If your not rebelling against it your obviously sucking up :rolleyes:, it's like users can't agree with staff for fear of being ridiculed by their peers.

[Sammeth.]

Also, about butting into someones job e.g. the Forum Managers job, here are a few things he or Elkaa should of posted and made the final though. Your job, ----MAD---- is with the Site. Unless you could explain while any other GM (Site Manager) before you worked more with the site, while you seem to take over and do this One Man Show part.

Mobile Devices sub-forum
---MAD---
--ss-- now a Forum Super Moderator.
---MAD---
H0BJ0B now Assistant Radio Manager.
---MAD---
Yum999 now assistant news manager.
---MAD---
mat64 now a Forum Super Moderator.
---MAD---
Garion now a forum moderator.
---MAD---

And:

J1MI takes over as Forum Manager.
---MAD---

Its always been the rule that General Managers are the only ones who can hire or fire managers/assistant managers, so it is the General Managers job to announce them. Not the forum manager.

[GommeInc]

Its always been the rule that General Managers are the only ones who can hire or fire managers/assistant managers, so it is the General Managers job to announce them. Not the forum manager.

No... The Manager of the Department should announce their assistants, otherwise they're not managers and they're not assistants. J1MI deals with everything forum related, MAD deals with the site. That's how it used to be and from experience, that worked better than someone who clearly would not have the time. MAD's job now, if it worked correctly and how it should work, would be a full time job.

The GMs role, which was Site Manager, is to pretty much keep the site running and let the Managers of the Site Departments report with any issues and new features they need to work properly. Not be over run by someone doing the job for them :rolleyes:

[J1MI]

No... The Manager of the Department should announce their assistants, otherwise they're not managers and they're not assistants. J1MI deals with everything forum related, MAD deals with the site. That's how it used to be and from experience, that worked better than someone who clearly would not have the time. MAD's job now, if it worked correctly and how it should work, would be a full time job.

The GMs role, which was Site Manager, is to pretty much keep the ste running and let the Managers of the Site Departments report with any issues and new features they need to work properly. Not be over run by someone doing the job for them :rolleyes:

Nope, GM's are only allowed to hire someone who is going to be taking up an admin position as the AFM job is. It's always been this way, the FM does have a big say in who he want's as his assistant though. If you look back 8f8 or sierk always announced AFM's.

GM's job is not to just keep the site running, it's to improve the site inspire new idea's in all departments, they've always had a massive say is what every department does, they're huge involvement ensures everyone is on the same level and working towards the saem goals.