omg mods read

[mat64]

I find it more funny then anything else.

May i add us Moderators cannot do anything but report avatars its down to the Super Moderators to take action, if any.

I don't think people are directing it at the normal moderators. I'm sure most people posting here are aware that it is super moderators that remove avatars/signatures.

[--ss--]

*Blink* Have you ever watched television in the day-time, or a music video, or any form of media? I personally don't find it offensive at all, it's just a joke? I mean... You might be thinking about it in too much detail, if you're that disturbed by it... Actually you thinking such? That's a disturbing thought.

I never said it's offensive, I said it's inappropriate which is an completely different thing.
It's inappropriate for obvious reasons, I do not see how me knowing what an image is trying to represent is disturbing seeing as in my eyes having cartoon styled pornographic jokes is not funny and quite immature.

Before anyone says i'm going all defensive, I had no involvement of removing his avatar and haven't noticed it before , i'm simply stating why someone would want an avatar such as that :/

[Pyroka]

Well you'll find 95% of this forums population would actually find that rather humorous. I think you need to realise you're on a forum for teenagers, not adults. Plus, we're not in school either so there's no need to treat these forums like a playground, pulling every single person over and telling them off. If you haven't noticed, it actually irritates some users quite a bit.

[GommeInc]

No it's not funny , to me it's quite disturbing having images such as that in cartoon form?
You may not use it as it is inappropriate .

So if it was two human characters with skin included, it would be appropriate?

It isn't inappropriate, it is neither vulgar, rude, offensive, nudity and anything that will upset members. So it is OK, not really appropriate but certainly not inappropriate...

[dannyisnotamazing]

Gomme do you just like to argue against anything in the feedback section?

[GommeInc]

Gomme do you just like to argue against anything in the feedback section?

... Maybe I only argue about the damn right insane things.

[Pyroka]

So if it was two human characters with skin included, it would be appropriate?

It isn't inappropriate, it is neither vulgar, rude, offensive, nudity and anything that will upset members. So it is OK, not really appropriate but certainly not inappropriate...

Agreed! Hey, lets remember why Moderators are in place: To protect the community who could be offended by other users & inappropriate content. I find this is one of those times where the users you're supposed to protect, might be the right people to listen to.

But then again, Moderators know the users better than the users themselves, right?

[Jamesy]

Although I usually hate to follow the masses, I would have to agree on this occasion. If there was many complaints or it was plainly vulgar or in bad taste then yes, by all means take it, but that was simply a cartoon image.

I've seen alts of naked habbos, and yet they stayed and were commented on by a moderator. You seem to have a lot of double standards.

[Kewl]

If it's so inappropriate it would have been edited out of his post when he re-posted it.

Thus i'd conclude it is allowed

[Pyroka]

Sorry to point out this, but the current position is that it's a 9 to 4 rate on the avatar being allowed. Maybe it's time to make some sort of amendment on your judgement?

EDIT: 9 to 5 rate. (What a way to make a livin'!) I do still think there's something wrong with this...