Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    19,678
    Tokens
    11,479

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    A Harry Potter film has yet to wow me. These better be good.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,049
    Tokens
    1,126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Neversoft View Post
    A Harry Potter film has yet to wow me. These better be good.
    I stopped at the first.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    new york.
    Posts
    11,188
    Tokens
    2,270

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Misawa View Post
    Anything above three hours won't draw theatrically. Tarantino is more of a draw than the Harry Potter when it comes to film, and Grindhouse bombed.

    i disagree. tarantino definitely has his line of dedicated fans, but there are so many people connected to harry potter. i think its a much bigger event.

    and the two parts thing will definitely work. the last two matrix movies came out within months of each other and both were a huge success.
    Last edited by RedStratocas; 14-03-2008 at 01:09 AM.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    6,445
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Wow, it might actually be good.

    Hopefully one day soon, when Daniel Radcliffe is dead, they'll hire a good actor to play Harry Potter and remake all of the films, changing and altering nothing from the books, making it a perfect representation of what the books actually are. There will be no restrictions, the films will last for hours on end and have perfect acting, fantastic casting and Rowling will write the script, direct the whole thing.

    Edit: Actually, scrap the actors. It will all be entirely computer-generated (obviously in 20 years from now when 3D animation is as perfect as real life). This way the characters will be exactly how they should look, Hermione won't turn into sex goddess after realising big hair isn't hollywood-attractive, Harry will be taller than 3ft and hit puberty, and Ron won't have a face like a wet fish.
    Last edited by Roboevil; 14-03-2008 at 01:33 AM.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    95
    Tokens
    1,284

    Default

    The fact that there will be 2 parts is a good thing my oppinion. Here is why: People including me are kinda sad to see both the movie and book series end. Even though the book has been read, its good to know there will in a way be 2 movies! ohhh booya =)
    http://i.imgur.com/5by36W1.png

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,634
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    It's not a good thing, they just want to make money.


  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    95
    Tokens
    1,284

    Default

    Well if you want to look at it from the companies point of view........ i was looking at it from the point of view of the consumers.. aka us
    http://i.imgur.com/5by36W1.png

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    UK, Reading, Berkshire
    Posts
    2,907
    Tokens
    1,471

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roboevil View Post
    Wow, it might actually be good.

    Hopefully one day soon, when Daniel Radcliffe is dead, they'll hire a good actor to play Harry Potter and remake all of the films, changing and altering nothing from the books, making it a perfect representation of what the books actually are. There will be no restrictions, the films will last for hours on end and have perfect acting, fantastic casting and Rowling will write the script, direct the whole thing.

    Edit: Actually, scrap the actors. It will all be entirely computer-generated (obviously in 20 years from now when 3D animation is as perfect as real life). This way the characters will be exactly how they should look, Hermione won't turn into sex goddess after realising big hair isn't hollywood-attractive, Harry will be taller than 3ft and hit puberty, and Ron won't have a face like a wet fish.
    I actually agree with all that I actually saw the first four films an thought they were wicked before reading the books but after reading them you actually can see how much of the story is missing

    The first was ok but a bit to cheesy for my likeing, the second was quite good actually, the third bored me to death, the fourth film missed Dobby out which I'll never forgive them for doing, the fifth had so many mistakes (e.g. they managed to blow a hole in the wall of the room of requirment =l) I bet they'll mess up Dumbledores Death in the next film and they soooo better not cut the funeral out because I actually shed a tear while reading that scene and the seventh one(s) meh I guess we'll find out
    Last edited by Dan2nd; 14-03-2008 at 03:14 PM.
    I’ll be a story in your head, but that’s okay, because we’re all stories in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? Because it was, you know. It was the best. A daft old man who stole a magic box and ran away. Did I ever tell you that I stole it? Well, I borrowed it. I always meant to take it back. Oh, that box, Amy, you’ll dream about that box. It’ll never leave you. Big and little at the same time. Brand-new and ancient and the bluest blue ever. And the times we had, eh? Would had…Never had. In your dreams, they’ll still be there. The Doctor and Amy Pond and the days that never came.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,917
    Tokens
    4,115

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan2nd View Post
    I actually agree with all that I actually saw the first four films an thought they were wicked before reading the books but after reading them you actually can see how much of the story is missing

    The first was ok but a bit to cheesy for my likeing, the second was quite good actually, the third bored me to death, the fourth film missed Dobby out which I'll never forgive them for doing, the fifth had so many mistakes (e.g. they managed to blow a hole in the wall of the room of requirment =l) I bet they'll mess up Dumbledores Death in the next film and they soooo better not cut the funeral out because I actually shed a tear while reading that scene and the seventh one(s) meh I guess we'll find out
    Instead of being Avada Kedavra'ed, he will be shot with a machine gun. Oh man, I wanna see that now.
    Sammeth.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Plymouth
    Posts
    9,406
    Tokens
    1,777

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Can anyone else saying "milking it"?

    Seriously...They didn't care about cutting down previous books but the last one they wanna make longer and into two parts? Oh I wonder why :rolleyes:

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •