Feedback about the feedback forum

[jrh2002]

The new forum proposals are mainly for things like games etc... (or at least the ones I have seen are). Since I don't have any interest in online games, I don't particularly care whether a new forum is created or not. If enough people reply to the thread saying they want that forum, then it is down to the Forum Manager or GM to create that forum, or give a good reason as to why not. It is not worth me posting to say "no we shouldn't have this forum because I don't like it..." as that is arogant, selfish, and unneccesary.

So as Mad has just said he wont allow a public debate sub-forum you are calling him arrogant, selfish and unneccesary? I cant say i agree with you on that :eusa_whis
I do understand that you cant reply to everything and I am not suggesting the FM, Every AGM, the GM and owner comment on everything but surely at least one or 2 from that group could help a debate? if all management ignore it even when it concerns them (yes they do) you wonder why so many people get frustrated

True, threads go off topic, but that is often because of the fact that it has been discussed so far that there are no new, relevant points to be made. Fair enough that isn't much of an excuse, but obvious off topic posting is dealt with as much as we possibly can.

Look at all the other forums and see how the mods deal with rule breakers surely the feedback forum shoul;d be modded the same if not better? the only edits i see are from mad when he closes a thread or moves it and not on individual rule breaking posts (apartfrom catzsy's).

[Adzeh]

No I'm not calling him arrogant, because if will have a good reason for not allowing a public debate forum, not the fact that he doesn't like debates.

Crunch, my input maybe valued, but that does not make it valid. I'm not about to post in a "lets have a forum for *insert game name here*" thread, unless I was 100% sure in my mind that there were a significant amount of people who would not use that forum; which would mean that this particular forum would not be good for the community.

At jrh: I've never ignored anything that was related directly to me, unless it would have resulted me flying off at someone and probably being fired for misconduct (which nearly happened once). I can't speak for the other AGMs on this, if they ignore something relevant to them, they will have a good reason.

[jrh2002]

its a public debate sub forum that is hidden out of the way and just to stop us messing up the thread asking for ideas on official habbox debates.
We can go in the discuss anything to debate there but it seems you get a more mature response when out of the way in the debates forum. I would love to hear the good reason for not allowing it instead of being told to debate elsewhere.

I can understand that sometimes you could fly off the handle because its just how I feel when i get fobbed off with poor excuses about an issue that from the poll most the members and alot of staff would want.

I have asked a few people questions by PM and await their response before I decide on my own hx future. I want to be part of a great site but feel like tony blair, gordon brown and saddam hussein are listening to the very people who have got them where they are today and just ignoring them its a very sad state of affairs.

[Recursion]

The forum isn't user based anymore, we don't get the things we like on it, its up to the ****** senior management nowadays.

[Catzsy]

I really can't see the problem with allowing something like this that is valid if there is enough demand on a trial. What's the worst that could happen if we had a new debate forum? It would not be continued after the trial. Its not as if the sun is going to fall from the sky or anybody is going to lose 'control' over their positions on the forum. :S