They never removed his/her female lowerparts, I heard about it on Channe 4.
They never removed his/her female lowerparts, I heard about it on Channe 4.
sick,
sorry but they're just weird.
Thats my mum your talking about!
He/she is still a female though? Shes got a vagina so shes still a female.
Its not a man?
If it still has all the female parts and everything, then its a woman.
Once again, the media is twisting stuff to make it sound more intresting.
If you have any queries or questions, just PM me!
:eusa_thin
Poor kid.
Thats horrible he/she shouldn't be allowed to have children.
Joined Habbox for the first time on the 29-10-2005 // Joined Habbox for the second time on the 08-10-2006 // Joined Habbox for the third time on the 30-09-2007 // Became a Habbox Writer on the 26-11-2007 // Became a Senior Habbox Writer on the 07-02-2008 // Left Habbox 01-07-2008 // Came back to habbox on 23-08-2008 // Became a Writer again on the 27-08-2008 // Became a Trialist Content Designer on the 22-09-08 // Left Habbox on the 30-09-08
I'm gonna be straight and blank here.
I think they should be allowed to have children, there's no problem with it whatsoever. The fact is, the child will go through alot in life, being the first child to ever be born from a transexual. I just don't see why you guys are being so objective, since the times are moving on and technology is advancing so fast. It seems more like what makes others happy, makes people disgusted. If you were him, and you were on top of the world, would you have an abortion just because nobody agreed with a birth?
But hey, thats getting into the abortion argument now. Fact is, God makes creation & if it's not meant to be, then the child will not live long. I'm happy for the guy, but it's a shame there's people like on this forum which are absolutely disgusted and so 'anti-future'. Wait until the space technology where police can detect weapons through cameras which 'view through clothes'. I'm sure thats how to make this world safe, but at the same time you'll all moan about it for it's 'against human rights'.
Laws contradicting laws... lol. I guess there's no 'World law' in this civilization we live in. A shame too. No-one can say the United nations are world law by the way, in fact they're a charity who support everyone in the world, whilst America blows it up.
Oops, that wern't straight at all was it.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!