Moderators editing posts

[Decode]

*LINK REMOVED*

Edited by Thaddeus (Forum Moderator): Please do not post links to inappropriate material.

I think he was talking about speaking, not head.

Edited by Thaddeus (Forum Moderator): Please stay on topic.

That was never off topic!

[The Professor]

There is a difference between mistakes and doing it on purpose. Obviously those mods did it on purpose. If they ever considered looking at a post both ways, maybe just maybe these mods will do a better job. :rolleyes:

On purpose? That's a pretty serious accusation, and one that holds no ground at all. He's even said that he might have been a bit too strict, what grounds do you accuse him of abusing powers on?

[Mrs.McCall]

Yes, it'd be fine. Although that wouldn't happen and I feel your examples are quite exaggerated, that'd still be fine.
Also, 4chan relates to Rick Rolling and was introduced in the original post. The posts formed a chain or "branched off" which is allowed.

In your opinion.

I feel that, back to my Ulrika Johnson example, if I posted about her new show... people posting about her marriages are unrelated and off-topic.

[Callum.]

Catzsy has just summed the thread up.

[today]

I think certain mods need a listen on what rules are...

[Dentafrice]

Well, although I decided against dealing with that post, I can see why it was decided to be dealt with by another moderator as it does indeed avoid the filter.

A warning or just an edit in my opinion would suffice but that's just me.

If there are any problems with infractions or warnings, report it in the specified thread, as has been said many times.

I really don't see why any action would be taken.

It is the name of a person from a movie.. not anything offensive.

[Thetan]

In your opinion.

I feel that, back to my Ulrika Johnson example, if I posted about her new show... people posting about her marriages are unrelated and off-topic.

Yeah, I see where you are coming from now. But like I said, this wasn't directed at just you, I have seen lots of other edited posts that should not have been edited, just that thread was one example.

[Tristan]

I really don't see why any action would be taken.

It is the name of a person from a movie.. not anything offensive.

Which is why I decided against dealing with it in the first place.
In hindsight I may have edited but yeah.

[Mrs.McCall]

Yeah, I see where you are coming from now. But like I said, this wasn't directed at just you, I have seen lots of other edited posts that should not have been edited, just that thread was one example.

No, I can 100% see where you are coming from.

I just thought that I'd explain my actions. I am not a moderator because I enjoy having a go at people. I'm not perfect, I may make mistakes but I feel it is unfair for people to attack moderators simply because they have a position of power on Habboxforum.

I would never, ever abuse my powers or edit for the sake of editing. I simply over-edited that thread, a misjudgment that was not done purposely. I think any suggestion otherwise is unjust and unfair.

[Callum.]

Well the post catzsy just made has a thread from 2006, maybe sierk needs to remind the moderation team / anounce it again.