
Windows 98
Windows XP
Windows Vista
OSX
Linux
XP, Pcs arent fast enough to run Vista, they have enough trouble to run XP.
As for Vista vs XP, Vista may use more resources than XP but its a superior product. The PCs that run it have the resources so why not use them? Its like saying Windows 95 runs faster than Vista so lets all use that, it makes no sense????
Because Microsoft is shipping Vista with computers with only 512mb of ram, and 800Mhz processors. Something they have no business doing.
I'm not crazy, ask my toaster.
We still use 2000.
I think all of Glasgow does.
We were ment to go to XP last October, didn't happen though.
OS10 Tiger in the little recording studio thing they have though
Last edited by HotelUser; 22-06-2008 at 01:27 AM.
I'm not crazy, ask my toaster.
Ahh, sounds good.![]()
Windows XP for me.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!