Perfectly summed up. Robinho isn't brilliant. I'd rather have Darren Fletcher any dayAs a Chelsea supporter, I'm actually quite satisfied that Manchester City have signed him and not us. We don't need another one of these world class talents, our midfield is already packed with them, we don't need another clogging the midfield up even further. He's inconsistent, leightweight and at £34 Million the transfer risk is incrediably high. Don't get me wrong, he's a talented player and although I was livid 2 hours ago, i'm content now.
Hello TopRed, if I'm not mistaken? (sorry if I am mistaken) But I guess this could be your new account? Good isn't it how City have made United pull another few odd million out of there pockets and thrown in a player on loan to Spurs because City have interfered with your transfer.
Hope the F.A deduct a large amount of points for meeting a player without the other teams permission, hope its every million you spent on him = 1 points. So that would be 31? If you round up the .75Might be fighting relegation at this rate.
We'll soon have to see what the F.A have to do about this.
And you say these negative things about Robinho after Man City beat you to buying him? Lol. I wonder if this is going to happen with every other signing that you lose to Man City.As a Chelsea supporter, I'm actually quite satisfied that Manchester City have signed him and not us. We don't need another one of these world class talents, our midfield is already packed with them, we don't need another clogging the midfield up even further. He's inconsistent, leightweight and at £34 Million the transfer risk is incrediably high. Don't get me wrong, he's a talented player and although I was livid 2 hours ago, i'm content now.
Well, i've had time to look at it (albeit an hour!) and i'm pleased as he wouldn't fit into our side really.
*Signature Removed*
Edited by opensourcehost (Forum Super Moderator): Please in future please remove signature images if the exceed the maximum size for your user group or when removal is when requested.
The problem for Chelsea is that you believe you can sign world class players for the first team squad and the bench, which is just wrong...
Last season your bench was worth £61m of what you paid for players on there. That means an average of £10m per players. I can't imagine what the value might be now that you can have seven players on the bench. :rolleyes:
Lol was watching it all the way through on SSN, I think somebody posted it but Robinho's debut could come against Chelsea at COMS.
As a Chelsea supporter, I'm actually quite satisfied that Manchester City have signed him and not us. We don't need another one of these world class talents, our midfield is already packed with them, we don't need another clogging the midfield up even further. He's inconsistent, leightweight and at £34 Million the transfer risk is incrediably high. Our formation doesn't suit him either, and he's the sort of player who requires the ball a lot, something he wouln't have here.
Don't get me wrong, he's a talented player and although I was livid 2 hours ago, i'm content now.
Robinho will be dissapointed not to sign for his first choice club in Chelsea, and to be honest bad luck to him at City.
Robinho's leightweight? ahah.
Well.
hes sure better than the players your getting on.
MALOUDA.
KALOU.
They are just as leightweight.
I dont know why they sold SWP.
hes better than both of them
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!