Post WWE News/Rumours/Results here.

[Wayne]

Are you on about gimmicks in attitude era or now?

[Captain]

Most of the audience aren't too bothered about solid wrestling, they watch it for entertainment.

[Misawa]

Gimmick matches, not wrestler gimmicks.

Wrestling is wrestling, wrestling is telling stories in the ring with great psychology, not weapons or cages or dumpsters. In moderation, like the WWE of today, is fine, to cap off feuds, but not all the time - that's garbage wrestling.

[newWORLDorder]

Everyone does not want the attitude era back. I for one do not. It was a phase, people will look back on this era and think it was the best ever. People will look back on the next generation and think it was the best ever. See where im going with this?


I just want a whole WWE revamp. Thats what made 2002 exciting.. this "WWE" made it feel like a whole different company. The WWE's attempt at a rebrand in January failed IMO.

[Captain]

I don't think i'll look back on this era and think it was the best ever. I think it's been terrible.

[Wayne]

I thought the 2003 era was quite good. Evolution, Booker T, RVD, Kevin Nash, Goldberg, Brock Lesnar, The Rock, Shawn Michaels etc. I won't look back on WWE now in a few years and say it was great.

[Misawa]

I don't segment the WWE into eras. I just look at the years it progresses. The only real "eras" you can call would be the Golden Age, and then Attitude.

[newWORLDorder]

Yeah, I think this generation/period or whatever you want to call it needs a big event to class it as an 'era' or whatever.

Edge wants Christians last run to be in WWE... good!

[Wayne]

I think a lot of people say that when Cena was the champion, that was a new era.

[newWORLDorder]

Your joking, right?