Windows 7? Worth it?

[HotelUser]

http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=3187
http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=3236&page=2

Yes it is. Find sites that use real tests.

Not only does the website I provided include more detailed information, but it uses a newer version. XP is faster.

[Nick.]

http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=3187
http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=3236&page=2

Yes it is. Find sites that use real tests.

shut up you fool.
not many people like you because you are such an arrogant **** who talks to everyone like you are the king or something. You are not, you are just some silly nerd who thinks they 'pwn teh worldz'. Go outside and see sunshine, chuckles xxxx


And I'd wait for the main OS to come out @ OP. I'll be buying it then (if it isn't £140+ :rolleyes

[Agnostic Bear]

shut up you fool.
not many people like you because you are such an arrogant **** who talks to everyone like you are the king or something. You are not, you are just some silly nerd who thinks they 'pwn teh worldz'. Go outside and see sunshine, chuckles xxxx


And I'd wait for the main OS to come out @ OP. I'll be buying it then (if it isn't £140+ :rolleyes

I would love to pat you on your head and send you on your way, you are getting very angry for no reason, see I am the king because:

A) Burger King is far better than McDonalds
and
B) I do my research before saying anything.

Not everyone is like you and likes going outside and talking to people. Stop getting so flustered over me, I know I'm fabulous but you don't need to be like that.

yes but thats the verion before 7000..

Not only does the website I provided include more detailed information, but it uses a newer version. XP is faster.

HNNNNNNNNG then it should be faster 7000 should be faster than 6801. As is expected with more refined code.

[Nick.]

I would love to pat you on your head and send you on your way, you are getting very angry for no reason, see I am the king because:

A) Burger King is far better than McDonalds
and
B) I do my research before saying anything.

Not everyone is like you and likes going outside and talking to people. Stop getting so flustered over me, I know I'm fabulous but you don't need to be like that.






HNNNNNNNNG then it should be faster 7000 should be faster than 6801. As is expected with more refined code.

Wow... with every post you become more and more of an arrogant ****.

[Agnostic Bear]

Wow... with every post you become more and more of an arrogant ****.

Please see my earlier post when I told you to stop getting flustered. This is nothing new with me

[HotelUser]

I would love to pat you on your head and send you on your way, you are getting very angry for no reason, see I am the king because:

A) Burger King is far better than McDonalds
and
B) I do my research before saying anything.

No you don't. It's very seldom that one of your posts are constrictive. I think the majority of members who know you would agree that you're arrogant. You clearly don't do your research correctly. Posting benchmarks for older versions, and then saying Win7 is faster than XP when it is clearly not.

Not everyone is like you and likes going outside and talking to people. Stop getting so flustered over me, I know I'm fabulous but you don't need to be like that.






HNNNNNNNNG then it should be faster 7000 should be faster than 6801. As is expected with more refined code.

Irrelevant. My benchmarks were from a trusted source and with a newer version of Windows. They are more legitimate than the ones you posted for an older version. Always look at the latest version. I question the legitimacy of your website's test results anyways. Vista installs faster than XP? Vista and Windows 7 boot faster than XP (then using another computer the results are totally different?) Very doubtable...mine goes into fine detail about how the operating systems were tested, yours is quite vague.

[DaveTaylor]

XP is slower than Windows 7 on my machine, my dads Mac Pro and my macbook, so I have to agree with Dan.

[CHA!NGANG]

You have the same laptop as me I like it as it is with Vista, but I might upgrade it.

[Agnostic Bear]

No you don't. It's very seldom that one of your posts are constrictive. I think the majority of members who know you would agree that you're arrogant. You clearly don't do your research correctly. Posting benchmarks for older versions, and then saying Win7 is faster than XP when it is clearly not.

Use XP, Use 7, stop being biased.

Irrelevant. My benchmarks were from a trusted source and with a newer version of Windows. They are more legitimate than the ones you posted for an older version. Always look at the latest version. I question the legitimacy of your website's test results anyways. Vista installs faster than XP? Vista and Windows 7 boot faster than XP (then using another computer the results are totally different?) Very doubtable...mine goes into fine detail about how the operating systems were tested, yours is quite vague.

Hurr durr doesn't matter 7 is still faster than XP, please see:

XP is slower than Windows 7 on my machine, my dads Mac Pro and my macbook, so I have to agree with Dan.

he never agrees with me so I must be right. The Dave Taylor has spoken.

It's faster than XP on my machine too.

[HotelUser]

Use XP, Use 7, stop being biased.

Hurr durr doesn't matter 7 is still faster than XP, please see:


he never agrees with me so I must be right. The Dave Taylor has spoken.

It's faster than XP on my machine too.

People can use whatever they want. XP is faster, though. After having used Windows 7 myself, and seen the statistics comparing both operating systems it's obvious to me that XP is faster. Windows 7 isn't as bloated as Vista, but it's still bloated.