How does this VIP Rule work exactly?

[Supersam]

Its a stupid rule in the first place. God knows why they made it.

They are greedy pigs like most large companies.

[Dada]

Well, maybe for now habboxforum should give out coloured names for donations? Except alot cheaper because you'd only be getting the coloured name. Wont be much profit, but it's better then nothing

but yeah its such a stupid rule >.<

[GommeInc]

They are greedy pigs like most large companies.

Except Habbo/Sulake are worse because, although they are a company that solely exist to make money, they are a social/community company too.

Time for some boring crap which suggests why Habbo are quite awful lately:

Habbo/Sulake are what business peeps may call a 'socio-economic' company. A socio-economic company usually sell a product which customers are meant to enjoy in a community or 'social' situations. These'social' and 'economic' factors are meant to be balanced, because when one becomes more focused on, the other one fails. At the moment they are focusing too much on the 'economic' or money side of things, and thus the social side is failing e.g. fansites and consumers are losing interest in the product because the company is delivering the goods with limitations i.e. you may not sell your own products when you consume/use products from us - which is where the copyright argument comes in.

It's like a socio-technical company. When the technical side becomes the centre focus point, the social side drops. In other words, when computers do too much of the work, the employees/consumers get bored and alienated.

[Supersam]

Except Habbo/Sulake are worse because, although they are a company that solely exist to make money, they are a social/community company too.

Time for some boring crap which suggests why Habbo are quite awful lately:

Habbo/Sulake are what business peeps may call a 'socio-economic' company. A socio-economic company usually sell a product which customers are meant to enjoy in a community or 'social' situations. These'social' and 'economic' factors are meant to be balanced, because when one becomes more focused on, the other one fails. At the moment they are focusing too much on the 'economic' or money side of things, and thus the social side is failing e.g. fansites and consumers are losing interest in the product because the company is delivering the goods with limitations i.e. you may not sell your own products when you consume/use products from us - which is where the copyright argument comes in.

It's like a socio-technical company. When the technical side becomes the centre focus point, the social side drops. In other words, when computers do too much of the work, the employees/consumers get bored and alienated.

I think they are worse purely due to the fact that they are willing to trample on supporters. If they are so hung up on making money that they are willing to stop small minor sites from making any income then they dont deserve such support.