No offence but no because Adam And Eva were white

No offence but no because Adam And Eva were white
Not that I'm religious, but in actuality, if you have two genetically healthy people, and they had children who were genetically healthy, and those children were incestuous, you wouldn't end up with disabilities. So yes, they were incestuous, but *apparently* Adam and Eve had lots of children (other than Cain and Abel) over a very long time, and it was for the sake of humanity/God's will, so that would mean incest was alright.After a few generations, any 'incest' would be no longer between brothers and sisters anyway.
I can't believe I'm arguing for the bible, but nowhere does it say that Adam and Eve were white, (just like Jesus wasn't white!), and I think Christians believe that any skin colour variations etc happened afterwards (which even evolutionists believe).
Last edited by TheEclipse; 21-04-2009 at 09:33 AM.
But if you were to beleve in evolution and if everything on this planet evolved from the same source of life or whatever does that not mean in some seriously distant way everything that is 'alive' on earth is in some distant way related and has just evolved in different directions?
Is that correct or have I misunderstood?![]()
I’ll be a story in your head, but that’s okay, because we’re all stories in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? Because it was, you know. It was the best. A daft old man who stole a magic box and ran away. Did I ever tell you that I stole it? Well, I borrowed it. I always meant to take it back. Oh, that box, Amy, you’ll dream about that box. It’ll never leave you. Big and little at the same time. Brand-new and ancient and the bluest blue ever. And the times we had, eh? Would had…Never had. In your dreams, they’ll still be there. The Doctor and Amy Pond and the days that never came.
Apparently they only had two sons aswell, so basically they had to have sex with their mum :S Basically Eve was the worlds first woman, and the worlds first ****
Unlucky if she had another boy after that.
LeanneLOL ♥ Aaron x Anarchy."seize the day, or die regretting the time you've lost"
Ooo, intresting.
ive always thought that. they had two sons, so one must have had sex with their mum. seems odd to me.
im not sure why im commenting on this thread tbh. i cant understand how anyone could believe the bible, but hey, thats just me. dont start getting all :@ with me
They're not the real Adam and Eve; they are just two human ancestors named after the characters in the story.No. You're wrong!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-chromosomal_Adam
Incest has nothing to do with it - it's called evolution =)
They had far more than just 2 children. The most notable (and really the only one much mentioned) other than Cain and Abel is Seth, who is often seen as Abel's replacement and whose descendants make their way down to Noah and then on from there after the flood etc. Seth's wife is stated as Azura btw, so he didn't do his mum![]()
They had more then Cain and Abel,
The Bible does not give us a specific number. Adam and Eve had Cain (Genesis 4:1), Abel (Genesis 4:2), Seth (Genesis 4:25), and many other sons and daughters (Genesis 5:4). With likely hundreds of years of child-bearing capability, Adam and Eve likely had 50+ children in their lifetime.
Like I said, if you want to argue something then atleast read/ research it.
Thats why i dont argue the bible so much, i havn't read it in so long.
Alot of religions don't believe the bible word for word, only a minority of religious people believe in creationism
Im not religious btwwhy not read the thread first? :s
bef
eloves
chin
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!