CoD 6

[Favourtism]

Yea I wasn't keen on the vehicles, all TA had to do was add a MP section that was with vehicles and one without, shame they didn't do that, but yea, I prefer WW2 anyway, the guns were 100x better than modern weapons, but almost everyone on that plays CoD on this forum is too interested in super high technology, the problem with MW is that it's no where near as realistic as the WW2 ones, you can't compete with WW2 because modern combat is pretty much go in, exract VIPs, supress enemies, modern weaponary is mostly to hold the enemy back or force to bring them down, not to kill, when you have them going rambo style as military operatives it just breaks the realism, which is why I prefer WW2 shooters because the guns were made to bring what they hit down, powerful, loud, the combat was to go in seize the objective whatever that may be and do whatever you had too in order to complete the objective, modern combat is not like that, they don't run into rooms shooting every single person, the major flaw with CoD4 that I had was when you had to kill Zakheav or whatever his name was, your objective was to kill him, it wouldn't of been that, why would you kill the guy that has all the information you need?

It's called a GAME for a reason lol

If it was so realistic in WAW then why was there last stand for about 30 seconds etc

[dbgtz]

Yea I wasn't keen on the vehicles, all TA had to do was add a MP section that was with vehicles and one without, shame they didn't do that, but yea, I prefer WW2 anyway, the guns were 100x better than modern weapons, but almost everyone on that plays CoD on this forum is too interested in super high technology, the problem with MW is that it's no where near as realistic as the WW2 ones, you can't compete with WW2 because modern combat is pretty much go in, exract VIPs, supress enemies, modern weaponary is mostly to hold the enemy back or force to bring them down, not to kill, when you have them going rambo style as military operatives it just breaks the realism, which is why I prefer WW2 shooters because the guns were made to bring what they hit down, powerful, loud, the combat was to go in seize the objective whatever that may be and do whatever you had too in order to complete the objective, modern combat is not like that, they don't run into rooms shooting every single person, the major flaw with CoD4 that I had was when you had to kill Zakheav or whatever his name was, your objective was to kill him, it wouldn't of been that, why would you kill the guy that has all the information you need?

They didn't need information off him, they needed to kill him as he lead the group and was sending nukes and stuff.

Also lol @ waw shi no numa. I done weapons glitch once (because we only needed 1 section) and i had the ray gun, flame thrower and a ppsh and I was thinking -lol if i get a wunderwaffe- and I did so it was like LOL.
Then the other guy died, I got trapped and died. :S