hargreaves is good on his day, i agree, just look at him in 2006, but rite now, i'd pick barry over him, without a doubt.
not to mention hargreaves is still injured for another year?
PSN: StefanWolves
Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.
Not that this is anything to do with the topic but it says at the bottom about Dallas Cowboys being worth less than Man Utd. Dallas Cowboys new stadium cost more than what Man Utd are worth.![]()
.
I thought he had to get his legs chopped off or sutin. Shame he didnt he would be more use without them.
quality player, i'd have him over any english defensive midfielder. if he's fit, defo world cup squad. hargreaves > barry. easy.
You just answered your own question! Yeah, at the moment, I'd have Barry rather than Hargreaves, because Hargreaves is injured. He has got set peice quality as well, which we miss when Lennon plays and Beckham doesn't. Once he plays, lets bumpity this thread. And no, he could be fit by October.
Is this sense I see? For swear it, sight! For I never saw true sense until this... afternoon. Hmm, nevermind. Bear in mind, he rates Hargreaves better than Carrick too, and he's a United fan. :eusa_danc
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!