'Naked' scanner in airport trial

[Sammeth.]

Im quite the exhibitionist, so I would rather they stick my pictures on billboards rather than throw them away.

[Ardemax]

..don't give you cheek? - darling nearly everytime we 'debate' I have to explain the most simple things over and over again and often you drift away from the subject, like remember how long it took me to get an answer out of you on how UKIP were a racist party?

They are related, both are involved in a culture designed to 'stop terrorism & crime' but I disagree, I believe it is going too far and as I said before, I see nothing wrong with the present system.

and off we are again

stop terrorism and crime? yes.
CCTV? no.

[Sammeth.]

The other day the Metro did a poll on if you supported or didnt support this idea, and it was over 90% that said they supported the idea and would voluntarily participate.

[Ardemax]

well i fink we know if it will be a hit or not

[-:Undertaker:-]

and off we are again

stop terrorism and crime? yes.
CCTV? no.

I am not saying it will not stop terrorism, I am saying why is this scanner needed (which is more intrusive) than the older scanners, when the older scanners have stopped terrorism - so why is this one needed?

[GommeInc]

Is this anti-terrorism fuelled by some sort of Americanism? I'm shocked at how British people are willing to have their bits on show infront of strangers for the sake of not dying when you head is turned the other way because terrorists are like spiders, crafty little buggars causing wide-spread paranoia What has happened to us?

The new system is interesting, but the old system was hardly a bad idea

[alexxxxx]

One more step towards a police state.

no one forces you to go to a privately owned airport.

[Sammeth.]

Is this anti-terrorism fuelled by some sort of Americanism? I'm shocked at how British people are willing to have their bits on show infront of strangers for the sake of not dying when you head is turned the other way because terrorists are like spiders, crafty little buggars causing wide-spread paranoia What has happened to us?

The new system is interesting, but the old system was hardly a bad idea

If passengers can refuse to be scanned I don't see the problem. Its a way better system, I would do it in a shot.

[GommeInc]

If passengers can refuse to be scanned I don't see the problem. Its a way better system, I would do it in a shot.

Yes but you're very vane dear You don't count I suppose as it is optional it's okay, but some may see it as random spending.

[Jordy]

They are related, both are involved in a culture designed to 'stop terrorism & crime' but I disagree, I believe it is going too far and as I said before, I see nothing wrong with the present system.

It doesn't do anything more than the present system. It's simply just more reliable, easier for the staff and easier for the passengers to walk through. Therefore being exactly the same just a lot more efficient.