Suggestion to bring in more members.

[Black_Apalachi]

You're right those are entirely similar concepts what's wrong with us

I don't see how this comment contributes to the thread more than the one you pointlessly -repped me for.

[StefanWolves]

You're right those are entirely similar concepts what's wrong with us

The American government could get a man on the moon & even drive a space buggy on it - during 1969.
The American owners of HxF can't sustain & keep members on a kids Habbo forum - during 2009.

Without mentioning that they're doing nothing about it.

Same principles, stop trying to be a smart ass?

[FlyingJesus]

It contributes in that it sets straight a negative and pointless statement. Your comment that I -repped stated that you didn't see any possible negative effects from bringing this in, showing that you hadn't read the thread and therefore was not given "pointlessly".

And Wolves that isn't the same principles at all... it's like saying that because Beckham lobbed the opposition keeper from his own half in the 90s we should be able to paint with our keyboards. Completely unrelated examples that prove nothing

[Immenseman]

And we wonder why new people don't stay;

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=610625

[StefanWolves]

It contributes in that it sets straight a negative and pointless statement. Your comment that I -repped stated that you didn't see any possible negative effects from bringing this in, showing that you hadn't read the thread and therefore was not given "pointlessly".

And Wolves that isn't the same principles at all... it's like saying that because Beckham lobbed the opposition keeper from his own half in the 90s we should be able to paint with our keyboards. Completely unrelated examples that prove nothing

We can paint with our keyboards!

Start>Accessories>Paint

Wala!

Now I'm being the smart ass.

And we wonder why new people don't stay;

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=610625

Hmm... In that thread, how ironic?

Thanks for highlighting the important bits

[FlyingJesus]

Of note in these threads is the part where I state that I'm not a particularly nice person. That however has no effect on how good my analytical and debate skills are

[Black_Apalachi]

It contributes in that it sets straight a negative and pointless statement. Your comment that I -repped stated that you didn't see any possible negative effects from bringing this in, showing that you hadn't read the thread and therefore was not given "pointlessly".

And Wolves that isn't the same principles at all... it's like saying that because Beckham lobbed the opposition keeper from his own half in the 90s we should be able to paint with our keyboards. Completely unrelated examples that prove nothing

You don't need to read every comment of a thread to contribute to it positively :S. The fact the rep was removed proves it was pointless. Are we allowed to call people idiots or not? Would be useful here.

[FlyingJesus]

Reading the thread would have shown you that there were negative sides to it, and yes when the thread is aimed at actually changing something fundamental about how the forum works it would be a good idea to actually read through it before coming to (let alone stating) an opinion on it. This is precisely why it's necessary for management here to act without public polling

[StefanWolves]

Reading the thread would have shown you that there were negative sides to it, and yes when the thread is aimed at actually changing something fundamental about how the forum works it would be a good idea to actually read through it before coming to (let alone stating) an opinion on it. This is precisely why it's necessary for management here to act without public polling

but yet you still don't provide me with the fundamental proof to prove my idea wrong.

- proof showing me that implementing this feature would mean we loose members
- how much it costs to main this forum
- how how much we need to be earning from advertising to maintain the forum
- if we are struggling to maintain this funding
- information that proves to me that by loosing 'x' amount guests we would loose 'x' amount of funding to pay for the forum

oh know, because you can't

only until nvr/sierk come online and say that they are struggling to pay for the forum and rely on guests for advertising will i support YOUR theory.

And TBH, I know a simple answer to your 'theory' if it is proved correct.

Put the prices of donator up to £2.

[FlyingJesus]

Nvr said already earlier in the thread that you were entirely wrong in saying that guest traffic isn't important, and I can't think why else we'd need a constant flow of guests moving about. If I'm wrong about the reason then you still have to concede that he's told you previously that their being here is important