Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,601
    Tokens
    95

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alkaz View Post
    No matter if it was better or what ever I dont think it would work as we've had the same, leading format for almost 6 years now. Changing it now would be like cancelling Eastenders.
    working on that its like cancelling big brother.

    change is always a good thing, but people are always hesitant at first. I think maybe a better change is needed, but, ill see what the new look rares look like first

    even though i never play habbo lol

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    12,405
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jin View Post
    We were considering also rating the furniture by its "availability". We dont want to confuse the hotel further by changing the system structure at this point and have the ambiguity between. ...
    I was going to mention something about availability but you would have to ensure that it would be updated on a regular basis along with the values as amounts of furni in circulation changes all the time.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Should just be done HHGS style (how they used to do it).

    Common
    Rare
    Very Rare
    Ultra Rare
    Extinct

    sort of like that. I added Extinct for rares such as the V Guitar. (not the one with the crappy ad on top of lol)


  4. #14
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    29,945
    Tokens
    4,427
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    No, collectors collect rares and then sell. Often a rare will seem the rarest thing in the world for a few days, then a whole load of them will appear in the market. It will cause arguments, we'll have people constantly saying 'my rare should be a super its very rare' and so on, theres miscs which are incredibly rare aswell which would cause arguments as people would say they are not rare, whereas others would.

    An example is the Peppermint Ice Cream Machine, quite rare on Habbo but a collector has 600+ of them and thus being the reason why they are so 'rare'. The HHGS style had rares organised and placed in sections based on how they were released, just as Habbox has at this current moment. Having a 'common' etc under the rares I think would work, but not basing where an item goes on how rare it is because it just wouldn't work.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 23-01-2010 at 08:24 PM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    No, collectors collect rares and then sell. Often a rare will seem the rarest thing in the world for a few days, then a whole load of them will appear in the market. It will cause arguments, we'll have people constantly saying 'my rare should be a super its very rare' and so on, theres miscs which are incredibly rare aswell which would cause arguments as people would say they are not rare, whereas others would.

    An example is the Peppermint Ice Cream Machine, quite rare on Habbo but a collector has 600+ of them and thus being the reason why they are so 'rare'. The HHGS style had rares organised and placed in sections based on how they were released, just as Habbox has at this current moment. Having a 'common' etc under the rares I think would work, but not basing where an item goes on how rare it is because it just wouldn't work.
    Totally. I disagree having sections changed for how rare, I just think it shoiuld be done hopw HHGS did it.


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •