Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29
  1. #11
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,024
    Tokens
    869
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    The BBC only pay millions because they have our money to waste, one of the main reasons why it should be privatised. On DJ'ing, as others have said it can vary a lot but the chances are you will not be on a good wage/even make it as a DJ unless you are exceptionally good and exceptionally lucky. There are only so many radio stations and only so many jobs.


  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,366
    Tokens
    325

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    The BBC only pay millions because they have our money to waste,
    you don't need to pay a penny to the bbc to get bbc radio (Y)

  3. #13
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,024
    Tokens
    869
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alexxxxx View Post
    you don't need to pay a penny to the bbc to get bbc radio (Y)
    BBC radio is funded by the license fee/government is it not?


  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,614
    Tokens
    90

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Have a look at the connexions jobs4u site

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,544
    Tokens
    4,033
    Habbo
    -S-G-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    BBC radio is funded by the license fee/government is it not?
    Just don't have a TV in your house if you think its a waste .
    I listen to the radio regularly and Radio 1 DJ's are always the best imo.

    Also no ads ever on TV or the radio, so its even better.

  6. #16
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,024
    Tokens
    869
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saurav View Post
    Just don't have a TV in your house if you think its a waste .
    I listen to the radio regularly and Radio 1 DJ's are always the best imo.

    Also no ads ever on TV or the radio, so its even better.
    Why should I not have access to a television because the BBC charge a stupid amount for a small choice of channels when Sky offers hundreds of Channels for a cheaper price. BBC - £139.50 per year compared to Skys range of appear to be cheaper deals with more choice, and as far as I know you don't have to pay anything like £139.50 per year for Sky TV services.

    The BBC is not only biased but also pays its staff obscene amounts of money (such as Jonathan Ross) and has jobs created year on year which contribute nothing, hence why they have such vague titles. There was a job in the news the other day which made no sense what so ever but I can't seem to find it now. The BBC does not need to be owned by the government, privatise it - maybe then it wouldn't be able to waste heaps and heaps of taxpayer money on lavish dinners with MPs.


  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,614
    Tokens
    90

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    Why should I not have access to a television because the BBC charge a stupid amount for a small choice of channels when Sky offers hundreds of Channels for a cheaper price. BBC - £139.50 per year compared to Skys range of appear to be cheaper deals with more choice, and as far as I know you don't have to pay anything like £139.50 per year for Sky TV services.

    The BBC is not only biased but also pays its staff obscene amounts of money (such as Jonathan Ross) and has jobs created year on year which contribute nothing, hence why they have such vague titles. There was a job in the news the other day which made no sense what so ever but I can't seem to find it now. The BBC does not need to be owned by the government, privatise it - maybe then it wouldn't be able to waste heaps and heaps of taxpayer money on lavish dinners with MPs.
    Was that job the director of change or something? Lol I think i remember seeing it

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    2,485
    Tokens
    25

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    depends how popular u are?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,544
    Tokens
    4,033
    Habbo
    -S-G-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    Why should I not have access to a television because the BBC charge a stupid amount for a small choice of channels when Sky offers hundreds of Channels for a cheaper price. BBC - £139.50 per year compared to Skys range of appear to be cheaper deals with more choice, and as far as I know you don't have to pay anything like £139.50 per year for Sky TV services.

    The BBC is not only biased but also pays its staff obscene amounts of money (such as Jonathan Ross) and has jobs created year on year which contribute nothing, hence why they have such vague titles. There was a job in the news the other day which made no sense what so ever but I can't seem to find it now. The BBC does not need to be owned by the government, privatise it - maybe then it wouldn't be able to waste heaps and heaps of taxpayer money on lavish dinners with MPs.
    If BBC doesn't pay such high amounts to presenters such as Jonathan Ross, other channels happily will - hence showing the demand for presenters such as him.

    BBC takes money as it is ad free and tries to provide good TV.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    1,186
    Tokens
    70

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    thanks for this

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •