Spoilers in signatures

[kk.]

I know that VIPs have a larger size for a signature image, as well as donators, I don't think I'd mind if all members were able to have any size image (within reason, maybe 700x700) if it's contained in a spoiler. The same as YouTube videos. The embed player doesn't load until the signatures clicked I don't think.

Maybe it could be a feature for just VIPs and donators?

Thoughts?

[Black_Apalachi]

What's the point of having a spoiler in a signature at all? I for one would never bother clicking it. I think it's best to keep tools such as spoilers for their intended usage anyway.

[kk.]

Which is? I use them to not have big images on show? Which is what this would be used for

[GommeInc]

Having a spoiler in a signature hiding images ruins the whole point of a signature. It could be abused too, having huge great images hidden away under spoilers which will be loading anyway (as they did in vb3). Might as well just keep text, quotes and images in signatures, and stuff like spoilers out.

[Jamesy]

Having a spoiler in a signature hiding images ruins the whole point of a signature. It could be abused too, having huge great images hidden away under spoilers which will be loading anyway (as they did in vb3). Might as well just keep text, quotes and images in signatures, and stuff like spoilers out.

I agree with this.

[kk.]

Having a spoiler in a signature hiding images ruins the whole point of a signature. It could be abused too, having huge great images hidden away under spoilers which will be loading anyway (as they did in vb3). Might as well just keep text, quotes and images in signatures, and stuff like spoilers out.

The user would chose whether to have a signature with a spoiler, as well as us deciding whether to click it. It's just to give users the option of having a bigger image, or video in the signature. It wouldn't be massive, 700x700. It's annoying finding an image or making one, and discovering it's like 700x303

[Seatherny]

The user would chose whether to have a signature with a spoiler, as well as us deciding whether to click it. It's just to give users the option of having a bigger image, or video in the signature. It wouldn't be massive, 700x700. It's annoying finding an image or making one, and discovering it's like 700x303

Surely people can trim down 3 pixels, not really hard...

[kk.]

Surely people can trim down 3 pixels, not really hard...

its harder and annoying if its an image off the internet, and if its more like 350, it can distort the image quite bad. When browsing on TSR, they can have anysize image they want, and as many as they like, even without a spoiler, and the forum loads fine :S

[Seatherny]

its harder and annoying if its an image off the internet, and if its more like 350, it can distort the image quite bad. When browsing on TSR, they can have anysize image they want, and as many as they like, even without a spoiler, and the forum loads fine :S

The people on there are sensible enough not to have 4 images with a total height of 2000px

[kk.]

The people on there are sensible enough not to have 4 images with a total height of 2000px

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show...postcount=1148

which is why i said maybe just impose a slightly larger limit 700x500/700, and allow people to have videos in the signatures