Exactly it's not fair if usernotes don't expire when cautions did.
I still prefer caution/infraction and I'm sure the moderators will prefer less hassle...

Probably less hassle Adam but there would be a lot more people banned. This way they have every opportunity to know what they are doing wrong, informally.![]()
Isn't it quite simple? I'm going to be really blunt here... don't break rules? lol
ok *stop being devils advocate*
but urm, 2 months is fine, lol?
i suggested the warning thing a while ago adam, but it was rejected because the PM is less robotic and a bit more personal.
drink up this bottle of yeah
and P A I N T your body on me
Back when I was a moderator, the usernote changed each time, and most of the time it definitely wasn't what was sent via PM.Well I don't count them over 2 months and I am sure most others don't either but that is an interesting & valid question to post which I am sure will be addressed.
Well the only instance I can think of, Jack, is when somebody is cautioned when we physically can't. What occasions were you thinking of?![]()
i'm out of touch, i'm out of love
i'll pick you up when you're getting down
and out of all these things i've done
i think i love you better now
do we get banned or warned about being banned for having a certain amount of usernotes? Cus i know i am well over 50 now and dont wanna get banned?
i say lower it 2 a month
ofwgktadgaf
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!