Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 39
  1. #21
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,120
    Tokens
    1,456
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catzsy View Post
    How do you work out they are the 4th largest party in the UK? The only parties behind them were the nutters and the Raving Monster loony party as far as I could see in any constitunency. Sorry if the vast majority of people had wanted what you said then they would have voted for them. That's democracy.
    Actually if you look at most results they came 4th and beat the Liberal Democrats in one/a few seats I believe. Here are the election results, its rather sad that its got to the stage where I have to copy and paste numbers for you to state the blindingly obvious, but here we are;

    General Election 2010 results




    European Election Results 2009



    General Election 2005 results



    European Election Results 2004



    (applies to all) - smaller parties cut from the tables to make space for charts in my post.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 09-05-2010 at 09:02 PM.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    10,595
    Tokens
    25
    Habbo
    Catzsy

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    No need to be sarky! Actually that was probably only because they wasted all those deposits in 300 seats for very little reward. Most of the parties behind them don't have the resources to put candidates up in that many seats so I don't see they have any credibility at all apart from the fact somebody was bank rolling them. Pro rata to the number of seats contested they are way behind some of the other minor parties. Style over substance.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catzsy View Post
    No need to be sarky! Actually that was probably only because they wasted all those deposits in 300 seats for very little reward. Most of the parties behind them don't have the resources to put candidates up in that many seats so I don't see they have any credibility at all apart from the fact somebody was bank rolling them. Pro rata to the number of seats contested they are way behind some of the other minor parties. Style over substance.
    Come on that is quite low. Of course UKIP are the fourth biggest party based on what we know. Who's to say that if the monster raving loonies contested every seat they wouldn't be the fourth largest party? No one, but seeing as we don't know we can't conclude that they could be the fourth biggest party, yet we can safely conclude that UKIP is.
    Last edited by Jordy; 09-05-2010 at 09:07 PM.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    64,162
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Dan I love how you talk about the "blindingly obvious" and then advocate proportional representation as though it's actually a good idea.
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    12,405
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I don't get how you can tell it was UKIP's votes that prevented the Tories from winning. I was considering UKIP but I voted Lid Dem in the end so surely my vote helped to prevent the Tories (or Labour) from winning, just like anybody who voted for anyone other than Conservative (or Labour)?

    Also why are there stats there for South Wirral and not North Wirral.. or even just Wirral (since I've never in my life heard it named North or South before)

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    ═╬═
    Posts
    7,060
    Tokens
    182

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Yet another ludicrous UKIP claim just to get some attention...
    Conductor of the Runaway Train of Militant Homosexuality

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mank-Chest-Hair
    Posts
    4,039
    Tokens
    2,266

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Its ridiculous and pretty stupid to assume that UKIP cost the Conservatives the election. Its the same as saying Greens or BNP etc cost them the election. You are assuming people who voted UKIP would have voted Tories if UKIP didn't exist and that's ridiculous.

    Its like saying "Oh no, Lib Dems cost Conservatives the Election as if Lib Dems didnt exist, Tories could have won".

    This is such a lame move.

  8. #28
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,120
    Tokens
    1,456
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catzsy View Post
    No need to be sarky! Actually that was probably only because they wasted all those deposits in 300 seats for very little reward. Most of the parties behind them don't have the resources to put candidates up in that many seats so I don't see they have any credibility at all apart from the fact somebody was bank rolling them. Pro rata to the number of seats contested they are way behind some of the other minor parties. Style over substance.
    A political party raises donations mainly through members and some richer donors, much like the Labour Party is funded mainly by the Unions. A donor does not have to donate to UKIP, they could donate to the BNP/Green Party or various other parties but they dont - because UKIP has their support and the support of many others.

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    Dan I love how you talk about the "blindingly obvious" and then advocate proportional representation as though it's actually a good idea.
    How is a system where a party that gets 36% gets nearly 50% of the parliamentary seats fair?
    Many other countries have proportional representation and function perfectly well.

    Quote Originally Posted by Black_Apalachi View Post
    I don't get how you can tell it was UKIP's votes that prevented the Tories from winning. I was considering UKIP but I voted Lid Dem in the end so surely my vote helped to prevent the Tories (or Labour) from winning, just like anybody who voted for anyone other than Conservative (or Labour)?

    Also why are there stats there for South Wirral and not North Wirral.. or even just Wirral (since I've never in my life heard it named North or South before)
    Not all UKIP supporters would vote Tory, however its same to assume that the vast majority would usually vote Conservative - which can be backed up by the fact UKIP performs its best in Tory strongholds, Howard & Cameron have both attacked the party and finally that you only have to look at UKIPs top brass who are nearly all (I think they all are actually) former members of the Conservative Party.

    Quote Originally Posted by Technologic View Post
    Yet another ludicrous UKIP claim just to get some attention...
    So various commentators and analysts are wrong and you are right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Saurav. View Post
    Its ridiculous and pretty stupid to assume that UKIP cost the Conservatives the election. Its the same as saying Greens or BNP etc cost them the election. You are assuming people who voted UKIP would have voted Tories if UKIP didn't exist and that's ridiculous.

    Its like saying "Oh no, Lib Dems cost Conservatives the Election as if Lib Dems didnt exist, Tories could have won".

    This is such a lame move.
    Most UKIP supporters would vote for the Conservative Party and indeed are mostly former Conservatives supporters. It is not a question of whether UKIP exists or not, it is a statement which the voters have shown which rings to the heart of the Tory Party - it has become something which has lost it support and lost it a parliamentary majority.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 10-05-2010 at 07:03 PM.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mank-Chest-Hair
    Posts
    4,039
    Tokens
    2,266

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    So basically lets blame the UKIP for the hung parliament and messing us up. .

  10. #30
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,120
    Tokens
    1,456
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saurav. View Post
    So basically lets blame the UKIP for the hung parliament and messing us up. .
    The blame lays with David Cameron for trying to be something his party is not, I believe your own party has also accused him of this in the past.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •