How and when is adoption justifiable?
ENDS - 23/05/2010
Adoption is a concept that is ever growing in the 21st century, with a growing number of people having unwanted babies. Many say adoptions are becoming a positive aspect of society, as they could take care of innocent children, who wouldn’t have had such a chance at living life to the fullest if it was not possible. Often children that come from less privileged parents who simply do not have the economic resources or are unwilling to take care of their children. Adoption, in general can give children a second chance in the world with the love from two parents, someone they can call “mummy” and “daddy”.
However, there is a debate against this where some view adoption as a negative aspect. Many adoptive parents find their child being mentally and physically unstable with whole spectra of problems such as bonding issues, emotionally impairment issues, education delay and this list can go on and on- some linked from problems experienced before the adoption. Depending on the age the child is adopted, he or she may not feel connected to their parents and can get violent, there have been court cases over such issues of the child getting overly violent. Also, the immorality standpoint of adoption is viewed by some people, as some have the ethos that adopting can be compared to wholesaling or selling your child. Adoption can have a negative mental affect on children as they are taken from a society they are used to and put into what can be considered alien territory to them. This again can be argued on the age that they are placed for adoption.
Anyway, the question for this week’s debate is a juicy one to grip your teeth into. it is how and when is adoption justifiable. Remember to give your reasons as to why you think so!


















