Scientist 'Infected' With Computer Virus

[W00TZEH]

*** i cant find the article, but basicallly everyone in the science world is laughing at him and his cheap publicity stunt.

[-:Undertaker:-]

Undertaker first posted that he will not give his fingerprints to anyone. Meaning he will never travel to the USA then as normally when you land and go through security, you have to have your fingerprints taken.

Which to most people it isn't a big issue as we want to go to the country and have a great time or visit family or work etc etc.

I place my civil liberties above that of a holiday - they are not worth sacrificing to the state, ever.

[Recursion]

I place my civil liberties above that of a holiday - they are not worth sacrificing to the state, ever.

Im with this guy.

The UK government already want whatever information they can get off me, I'm not gunna let another country too.

[xxMATTGxx]

I don't see the big issue of a country to take my fingerprints. Even the US themeparks had it so I could access them though the gates. Obviously it was some other country, I probably wouldn't of liked it. But you can't really say "no" to them once you have landed. If someone could point out why you don't like it, then I may agree. But at the moment I really don't think its an issue.

[wiktoria]

Seen it on BBC news. That's just weird

[Wig44.]

Undertaker first posted that he will not give his fingerprints to anyone. Meaning he will never travel to the USA then as normally when you land and go through security, you have to have your fingerprints taken.

Which to most people it isn't a big issue as we want to go to the country and have a great time or visit family or work etc etc.

I'm not talking about fingerprints alone, I mean I would never allow them to have all of personal information on a chip including DNA, fingerprints, all financial assets etc. If you were to 'step out of line' what if such a chip could be turned off (as has been suggested) meaning you lose your identity?

[xxMATTGxx]

I'm not talking about fingerprints alone, I mean I would never allow them to have all of personal information on a chip including DNA, fingerprints, all financial assets etc. If you were to 'step out of line' what if such a chip could be turned off (as has been suggested) meaning you lose your identity?

I don't agree that we should be made to have chips put inside us with all of our information. I just find it odd that people won't give their fingerprints when needed. Such places like the USA.

[triston220]

It is very scary how far these things go and is just another extension of the disasterous ID card and database schemes that Labour imposed on the country - I will never ever ever wear one of these chips, nor will I give my fingerprints, DNA or anything else.

My body, my business.

You won't have a choice if you're arrested.

[hah]

What if your mum and dad said you're going to america with them for a hoilday with them...? what would you do then?

[-:Undertaker:-]

I don't agree that we should be made to have chips put inside us with all of our information. I just find it odd that people won't give their fingerprints when needed. Such places like the USA.

The United States or any other country for that matter does not need my fingerprints - I am not a criminal or a threat.

You won't have a choice if you're arrested.

Then they'd have to take it via force although arresting is different, I support a criminal database but not one for innocent people.

What if your mum and dad said you're going to america with them for a hoilday with them...? what would you do then?

Not go.