I still think the 'need to spread' rep quota is too high

[Black_Apalachi]

Sounds good Oli

15 Seems great, actually

Is it also possible to have things like an experiation date - aka if you havent rep'd 15 people during a certain set time, it resets so the same person can be rep'd again? :L

This is what I was thinking. If you still haven't repped 15 people after like a week, it should reset because you obviously aren't spamming rep.

[FlyingJesus]

Let's do it.

Sick keep that kind of talk out of feedback :@

[leer34$]

Maybe 15 in between 10 & 20?

[buttons]

30 is far too high. I think 10, but y'know!

then you'd be able to rep same person every few days
everyone would abuse it (i definitely would)
i think it's fine as it is both the amount of people you can rep daily (i normally only find 4 or 5 good posts to rep every 2 days or so O.o) and the amount of people you need to rep before you can again...

[jackass]

then you'd be able to rep same person every few days
everyone would abuse it (i definitely would)
i think it's fine as it is both the amount of people you can rep daily (i normally only find 4 or 5 good posts to rep every 2 days or so O.o) and the amount of people you need to rep before you can again...

But you no one does? :S

[Black_Apalachi]

then you'd be able to rep same person every few days
everyone would abuse it (i definitely would)
i think it's fine as it is both the amount of people you can rep daily (i normally only find 4 or 5 good posts to rep every 2 days or so O.o) and the amount of people you need to rep before you can again...

But that means you have to wait roughly two weeks to rep somebody again. Don't you find that there's always a few people who 90% of the time post things you like an want to rep?

[Tintinnabulate]

15 Seems great, actually

Is it also possible to have things like an experiation date - aka if you havent rep'd 15 people during a certain set time, it resets so the same person can be rep'd again? :L

That's not possible.

[AgnesIO]

Have to say I was pleased to see this thread.

I don't want it lowered to an amount that people can just give out pointless rep until they can rep their friend again.

My original thought was 20 although that could still be too high still so I am tempted to say 15.

I don't think it'll cause many problems so you may see this quite soon

I am not arguing since you have agreed (nice to see haha), but just thought I should point out people are more likely to give pointless rep on a large limit because they won't be ble to rep there mates for ages again

I have received a few +Rep's saying 'need to spread', being a good citizen etc I actually reported two of them, kept a few mainly because it made up for some lame -rep's lol

But yeh good idea :-)

[Catzsy]

Good decision Guys. I have felt for awhile it is a bit harsh. This should help matters.

[Special]

30 is kinda high tbh, i think 20 too