Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


View Poll Results: What should Britain do when it comes to EU funding?

Voters
16. You may not vote on this poll
  • Halt membership payments altogether

    11 68.75%
  • Decrease/lower membership payments

    3 18.75%
  • Keep membership payments the same

    2 12.50%
  • Increase membership payments to the EU

    0 0%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,018
    Tokens
    814
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default Britains EU membership bill (direct payments) to RISE to £10.3bn per year

    http://www.ukip.org/content/latest-n...-to-pound103bn
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle7150196.ece




    Britain’s EU membership fee will soar to £10.3bn a year by 2014 according to a revised estimate from the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR). The hike is due to Tony Blair’s disastrous decision to give up part of Britain’s EU rebate in 2005 – a decision described by UKIP deputy leader Lord Monckton last week as a foolish attempt to secure the EU presidency.

    The OBR – a new watchdog chaired by economist Sir Alan Budd – also revised upwards Britain’s contributions to the EU budget for 2009/10 to £8.3bn, from the previously estimated £7.6bn. Sarah Gaskall, from the Open Europe think tank, said: “It is now shockingly clear just how poor the deal Tony Blair negotiated in 2005 was for the UK.”
    While we are being forced to cut back out own services that we pay for, the European Union just keeps spending and spending and spending - our money is going to an organisation whos audits have not been signed off in the past eleven years with suspected billions missing as the reason, an organisation which uses British taxpayer money to fund wasteful programmes and propaganda machines and more to the point; we are paying for things such as new roads in Romania, the Czech Republic and the disasterous CAP policy which hugely benefits France.

    With all this in mind (not to mention the huge deficiet we face);

    Do you think we should altogether halt our EU payments, not increase them or increase them?

    Thoughts?
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 15-06-2010 at 02:02 PM.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Billingham, near Middlesbrough
    Posts
    5,417
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    what's your point?

  3. #3
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,018
    Tokens
    814
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    My point is that a) Tony Blair sold us out for his own personal gain & b) we are having to cut vital services such as the armed forces but the EU just keeps spending. I would have thought that blitheringly obvious really, or do you think the EU should spend more while countries across Europe such as the UK are having to cut back vital public services by a large margin thanks to the devastation left behind by failed left wing governments and a currency that is as much as a joke as the monopoly currency?


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,817
    Tokens
    63,679
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    We can't afford to be doing this. If we sort ourselves out then I have no issue with what we spend elsewhere, but it makes no sense to send more money out of the country when we're struggling ourselves. For those who fancy being communist: if we're more stable then we are better equipped to help everyone else out and everyone wins that way.
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    We can't afford to be doing this. If we sort ourselves out then I have no issue with what we spend elsewhere, but it makes no sense to send more money out of the country when we're struggling ourselves. For those who fancy being communist: if we're more stable then we are better equipped to help everyone else out and everyone wins that way.
    ^ Same as Jesus. We shouldn't be sending money out of the country when we need it for ourselves. If we weren't in the pro-verbial toilet, then it would be okay to send this money out to be splashed around, but in the current climate it's dangerous and unnecessary. It's our money, we should spend it on ourselves. And as Jesus said again, we'd be more help if we were stable and have everything under control, at the moment the EU is the least of our worries :/

    It's shocking the amount we send over to the EU already. The EU shouldn't be getting any extra money at the moment when it's member states need it more than some over-glorified organisation which doesn't disperse the money equally or provided any extra help, especially when the UK is one of the main countries :/ Hopefully Cameron sticks by his word, or we've somehow wasted our votes on a terrible government.
    Last edited by GommeInc; 15-06-2010 at 04:50 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,726
    Tokens
    14,846

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    We shouldn't even be in the EU. Its just like Eurovision, we pay the most out of any country to be a part of it yet get the worst deal. I swear most countries see us as a meal ticket and when they've exhausted all of our services and resourves they will be the dominating powers as we wont have a leg to stand on. Ridiculous.


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,426
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    We are a laughing stock.



    sod the lot

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,366
    Tokens
    325

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alkaz View Post
    We shouldn't even be in the EU. Its just like Eurovision, we pay the most out of any country to be a part of it yet get the worst deal. I swear most countries see us as a meal ticket and when they've exhausted all of our services and resourves they will be the dominating powers as we wont have a leg to stand on. Ridiculous.
    that's where youre wrong. in eurovision we get automatic qualification for the final.

    not to mention eurovision pulls in more views than a drama in that timeslot for less money
    goodbye.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alexxxxx View Post
    that's where youre wrong. in eurovision we get automatic qualification for the final.

    not to mention eurovision pulls in more views than a drama in that timeslot for less money
    You kinda proved his point lol - we pay alot, but for what? We don't really get acknowledged for doing anything.

    And dramas are at least a little bit easier to watch, not the carp they put in Eurovision (especially our dreadful entries). Carp I say, carp!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    12,315
    Tokens
    33,716
    Habbo
    dbgtz

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I wanna know where all of this goes to be quite frank. I actually do not see anything except a bunch of douchebags deciding rules for us, surely we couldn't just get the people we ALREADY pay to do that?
    Oh but easier travel. Hmm is that worth £10.3bn? And to someone who doesn't go abroad it's pretty damn pointless.
    And why should we have to pay for other peoples welfare? Sorry but it's true, you have to fight (not literally guns and crap) and work in this world in order to get somewhere, so what do we do? Give it to people who could make some effort and get money themselves.

    Off topic sorta but how much do we pay atm and how much does Germany pay atm?

    EDIT: Also what happens if we decrease/increase our payment?
    Last edited by dbgtz; 23-06-2010 at 07:55 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •