EU fines Britain more than £150 million for not displaying EU propaganda

[AgnesIO]

That's right, I always rant about it don't I. That's why this is my first post about this..

My dad was originally a teacher in a special needs school, which he quit when funding was cut for what the school needed for no reason. And no my dad does not quit jobs for the sake of it

Now if I could be bothered to listen to someone, who like me, as far as I am aware isn't actually old enough to vote, then I would - but to be fair you don't actually know anything like as much as you think you do. You are simply a UKIP supporter who refuses the fact that UKIP CAN do wrong. Which they can.

And just so you know the reason I went on about UKIP and the Daily Mail is because that's all you ever go on about.

[-:Undertaker:-]

That's right, I always rant about it don't I. That's why this is my first post about this..

My dad was originally a teacher in a special needs school, which he quit when funding was cut for what the school needed for no reason. And no my dad does not quit jobs for the sake of it

Now if I could be bothered to listen to someone, who like me, as far as I am aware isn't actually old enough to vote, then I would - but to be fair you don't actually know anything like as much as you think you do. You are simply a UKIP supporter who refuses the fact that UKIP CAN do wrong. Which they can.

And just so you know the reason I went on about UKIP and the Daily Mail is because that's all you ever go on about.

The funding was cut back when Thatcher was in office or not? well let us go into why that could be. In 1979 there was a winter of discontent caused by the last Labour government under James Callaghan - we had dead bodies piled in the morgues, rubbish piled high on the streets and the famous 3-day working week. We had no money so we had to cut. If you do not have the money then you cannot spend what is not there. Back then and its examples are very similar to the modern day, a Labour government came in and accumalated a large debt to which the Tory government had to cut to be rid of it. Let me ask you a question, if you were to go in to debt - would you cut back and try and rid yourself of that debt or would you take out more loans to fund your unfundable lifestyle thus putting you in more debt?

UKIP can do wrong, yes we've had our bad share of eggs like any organisation. However we are not discussing UKIP and its deeds (such as internal sabotage with the BNP) and the numerous times it has nearly split fully into two parties. This thread in about the European Union and the benefits, negatives and motives behind it and not about the Mail or UKIP. The only one who has ranted on about the Mail and UKIP is yourself and now you've made me go into it aswell.

Now a reply please to the Lisbon Treaty point, it has nothing to do with UKIP or the Mail - just the facts, quotes and figures concerning the EU Consitution and the Lisbon Treaty - I await a reply with evidence. I have no Mail here, no UKIP - only facts, figures and quotes and i'm ready to discuss it at length with you as you seem to claim I have no idea what I am on about - so let us see if that is the case.

[AgnesIO]

The funding was cut back when Thatcher was in office or not? well let us go into why that could be. In 1979 there was a winter of discontent caused by the last Labour government under James Callaghan - we had dead bodies piled in the morgues, rubbish piled high on the streets and the famous 3-day working week. We had no money so we had to cut. If you do not have the money then you cannot spend what is not there. Back then and its examples are very similar to the modern day, a Labour government came in and accumalated a large debt to which the Tory government had to cut to be rid of it. Let me ask you a question, if you were to go in to debt - would you cut back and try and rid yourself of that debt or would you take out more loans to fund your unfundable lifestyle thus putting you in more debt?

UKIP can do wrong, yes we've had our bad share of eggs like any organisation. However we are not discussing UKIP and its deeds (such as internal sabotage with the BNP) and the numerous times it has nearly split fully into two parties. This thread in about the European Union and the benefits, negatives and motives behind it and not about the Mail or UKIP. The only one who has ranted on about the Mail and UKIP is yourself and now you've made me go into it aswell.

Now a reply please to the Lisbon Treaty point, it has nothing to do with UKIP or the Mail - just the facts, quotes and figures concerning the EU Consitution and the Lisbon Treaty - I await a reply with evidence. I have no Mail here, no UKIP - only facts, figures and quotes and i'm ready to discuss it at length with you as you seem to claim I have no idea what I am on about - so let us see if that is the case.

Just to point out I have now made posts in this thread, but previously only made two - so I would appreciate it if you didn't act as if I have gone on and on and on.

[AgnesIO]

The funding was cut back when Thatcher was in office or not? well let us go into why that could be. In 1979 there was a winter of discontent caused by the last Labour government under James Callaghan - we had dead bodies piled in the morgues, rubbish piled high on the streets and the famous 3-day working week. We had no money so we had to cut. If you do not have the money then you cannot spend what is not there. Back then and its examples are very similar to the modern day, a Labour government came in and accumalated a large debt to which the Tory government had to cut to be rid of it. Let me ask you a question, if you were to go in to debt - would you cut back and try and rid yourself of that debt or would you take out more loans to fund your unfundable lifestyle thus putting you in more debt?

UKIP can do wrong, yes we've had our bad share of eggs like any organisation. However we are not discussing UKIP and its deeds (such as internal sabotage with the BNP) and the numerous times it has nearly split fully into two parties. This thread in about the European Union and the benefits, negatives and motives behind it and not about the Mail or UKIP. The only one who has ranted on about the Mail and UKIP is yourself and now you've made me go into it aswell.

Now a reply please to the Lisbon Treaty point, it has nothing to do with UKIP or the Mail - just the facts, quotes and figures concerning the EU Consitution and the Lisbon Treaty - I await a reply with evidence. I have no Mail here, no UKIP - only facts, figures and quotes and i'm ready to discuss it at length with you as you seem to claim I have no idea what I am on about - so let us see if that is the case.

Just to point out I have now made posts in this thread, but previously only made two - so I would appreciate it if you didn't act as if I have gone on and on and on.

[-:Undertaker:-]

Just to point out I have now made posts in this thread, but previously only made two - so I would appreciate it if you didn't act as if I have gone on and on and on.

Yes you have, all you've done is post about the Daily Mail and UKIP whilst telling me i'm wrong on the European Union.

If you think I am wrong and are prepared to say it, then prove me wrong with some evidence - make me look a fool.

I still await a reply to the Lisbon Treaty/Consitution point which you have ignored (yet again).

[AgnesIO]

Yes you have, all you've done is post about the Daily Mail and UKIP whilst telling me i'm wrong on the European Union.

If you think I am wrong and are prepared to say it, then prove me wrong with some evidence - make me look a fool.

I still await a reply to the Lisbon Treaty/Consitution point which you have ignored (yet again).

Sorry I get quite bored of your same old posts, I don't paticularly enjoy reading them - so got bored after the first 5 lines of your essay.