if we're not allowed to mention certain sites

[hah]

/b/, /d/, /e/, /gif/, /h/, /hr/, /r/, /s/, /t/, /u/, /y/ /r9k/, /int/, /rs/

all them had stuff which is against the rules such as torrents, cartoon porn (lol), porn, gore.
id say its over 60%
you aint winning this lol

[Meanies]

hardly an infractable offence for mentioning the name of a website most people know about anyway:S

[W00TZEH]

/b/, /d/, /e/, /gif/, /h/, /hr/, /r/, /s/, /t/, /u/, /y/ /r9k/, /int/, /rs/

all them had stuff which is against the rules such as torrents, cartoon porn (lol), porn, gore.
id say its over 60%
you aint winning this lol

Show Hide

33% are NSDW

---------- Post added 16-07-2010 at 07:50 PM ----------

*nsfw.

[Recursion]

Everyone knows about *REMOVED*, why even bother filtering it? Seriously.

Edited by Oli (Forum Manager): Please do not name inappropriate sites

[Recursion]

Okokok, got a PM about the above, can we even see a list of these sites? Excluding my above post, a fair number of people may not even know what sites are or are not banned.

[Hecktix]

Okokok, got a PM about the above, can we even see a list of these sites? Excluding my above post, a fair number of people may not even know what sites are or are not banned.

Any site which contains 18+ material is forbidden to be mentioned at HabboxForum.

[GommeInc]

YouTube, Facebook, Myspace, ChatRoulette, Cam4, omegle, iSketch... All these involve 18+ material. Last I checked 4 Jackie Chan was the same, you had to look for it to find it, and judging by Wootzeh's post less than half of the website is explicit material :/ And that website is known around these parts - I personally have never bothered browsing round it but a name isn't that bad, and the website itself isn't bad unless you purposely look for the bad things, like the websites mentioned above.

[Jordy]

YouTube, Facebook, Myspace, ChatRoulette, Cam4, omegle, iSketch... All these involve 18+ material. Last I checked 4 Jackie Chan was the same, you had to look for it to find it, and judging by Wootzeh's post less than half of the website is explicit material :/ And that website is known around these parts - I personally have never bothered browsing round it but a name isn't that bad, and the website itself isn't bad unless you purposely look for the bad things, like the websites mentioned above.

Damn you beat me to it. Frankly I don't see what's wrong with people posting the names of sites which contain over 18 content, if they then proceed to google them and go on the website they're at their own risk.

I also don't see what's wrong to hyperlinking to parts of websites which may contain over 18 content. For example you could hyperlink to parts of Facebook, YouTube or the cleaner boards on 4Jackie Chan. However there's no risk of people hyperlinking to pornographic websites as the entire website contains over 18 content.

[GommeInc]

Damn you beat me to it. Frankly I don't see what's wrong with people posting the names of sites which contain over 18 content, if they then proceed to google them and go on the website they're at their own risk.

I also don't see what's wrong to hyperlinking to parts of websites which may contain over 18 content. For example you could hyperlink to parts of Facebook, YouTube or the cleaner boards on 4Jackie Chan. However there's no risk of people hyperlinking to pornographic websites as the entire website contains over 18 content.

Not forgetting many sites have warnings saying they contain adult content

[Hecktix]

The age of some of the younger members needs to be considered and we're not willing to have names of sites which contain such material, the site mentioned contains some very inappropriate material, moreso than the other sites you have named there.

I think Wootzeh's claim to filter it is a valid one, but either way it will definitely not be allowed to name such sites and never has been and this view has come from Habbox Ownership over the years too.