Why isn't the top contributor in the Debates section announced?

[Catzsy]

kk, but now watch some members think "i contributed a lot and only one person won".

Oli has changed it to 'Top contributor(s) so more than one member can win, if they feel it is right to do so.:S
It is much clearer than before and reflects what actually happens.

[Nemo]

I think you're both nitpickin' and there isnt any need to change one letter in it, dont even know why this thread is still bein discussed.

[Tintinnabulate]

Oli has changed it to 'Top contributor(s) so more than one member can win, if they feel it is right to do so.:S
It is much clearer than before and reflects what actually happens.

only saying as you cant have more than one winner most of the time due to vip limit
but yeah ok. like nemo said, no point discussing it.

[Nixt]

Actually I think Catzsy is right in a sense. To my knowledge I changed it at some point so only one person would win the prize per debate. I'm pretty sure that was the plan, I'm not sure what has happened but I'll look into it.

[Hecktix]

Actually I think Catzsy is right in a sense. To my knowledge I changed it at some point so only one person would win the prize per debate. I'm pretty sure that was the plan, I'm not sure what has happened but I'll look into it.

Actually, that was changed (upon agreement with you, me & matt) when Grig gave a member VIP for one post in a debate which wasn't successful.

That's when we ruled that if a debate is not substantial that we won't award VIP for it and Grig is welcome to use his other quota elsewhere, as long as it wasn't used stupidly.